RyanShort1 wrote:
Thanks Jim.
I don't know why there's such a rush to throw under the bus. Yes, mistakes appear to have been made, but ye old "Golden Rule" ought to be applied to our comments. Think how you'd want to be treated if you made a similar mistake and survived.
Here is what I think is going on: People are in shock. They read through the NTSB information (which, based on my personal experience in recent years, is unfortunately biased and pushing an agenda) and they come away with this vision that CF is an absolute train wreck waiting to kill more people. I'm not sure that is entirely true. I think CF was probably cutting some corners in order to make the rides happen. Might have been too non-challant about things, but I just can't trust the NTSB enough anymore to believe that the issues were systemic....just because the NTSB says so.
The other, perhaps bigger danger, is that when people start to come to a conclusion that the issue was something stupid and egregious, then it becomes easier to dismiss and say that 'that will never happen to me, I'm not that stupid'. And then they go on about their business.
I never knew Mac, but from my friends that knew him well, I don't think the NTSB characterization was a fair one and quite frankly, in typical NTSB fashion, by pushing that narrative, they miss the greater teaching point for the community.
Every vintage/warbird aircraft type has a handful, in some cases one or two, devoted experts. We all know them. B-17, B-25, DC-3, TBM, Beech 18...etc. They all have at least one expert that everyone turns to. Mac was one of those for the B-17 world. We need those people to keep 'em flying. They are critical to keeping these airplanes in the air. BUT, the downside of that is that some of these guys are really flying these complicated airplanes single pilot because their experience so far surpasses anyone that might occupy the other seat. For me, that is the biggest takeaway from 9-0-9. Mac was not using CRM and essentially single pilot flying that airplane and because of his vast experience, he was that much more susceptible to confirmation bias. Based on the events of that morning, he had every reason to believe the issue was a mag issue on number 4 and he feathered it without realizing the real issue was detonation on number 3.
If we want to keep these airplanes flying, we have got to employ the many lessons learned about CRM that have been learned since the airplanes were built.
Gunny Perdue has an excellent video analysis on the crash. Worth watching:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3p-hGR3ZyY