Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:29 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 3:17 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
I'm re-reading Hagedorn's excellent North America's T-6...which prompts me to ask a question I've wondered about for awhile....

Why the "S" i.e. Scout in the designation?
It makes sense with dive bombers (SBC, SB2C, SBD), various observation types (SO2C, SO2U), but it doesn't make much sense with the SNJ (considering it wasn't a combat type and didn't usually operate from carriers and never off cruisers/battleships), and even less sense in the case of the SNB.

Also, the first Navy North American trainers were called NJs.

Considering the time they were procured, there wasn't a need for a phony designation to hide the contract.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Last edited by JohnB on Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 5:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2520
S(Scout) N(Trainer) J(North American)

https://www.t6harvard.com/harvard-types/snj/

http://www.rwebs.net/avhistory/acdesig/usnavy.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:11 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
I know what the S means...I didn't spell it out because I figured everyone here would know...but why the "Scout" prefix...when neither were used in that mission?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 7:36 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2520
http://replicainscale.blogspot.com/2011 ... prise.html

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Thu Apr 11, 2019 10:15 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1234
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
I guess they met the criteria to be considered "Scouts" if it came to that. Wondered the same thing about the SNV. Happily we never got that hard up that they had to be used much for that.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Fri Apr 12, 2019 12:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Travis AFB
If you look back at pre WWII aircraft, almost everything was a scout. The US had very few fighters and bombers and they just grouped everything else as a scout. It goes all the way back to WWI when the first planes were used for artillery spotting and scouting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:17 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
Bump.

Come on, no Navy experts out there? :)

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:05 am
Posts: 378
From what I understand, the Navy's trainer designation "N" (ie. N3N or N2S) was only applied to the equivalent of the USAAF's primary trainers while they used the designation "SN" for scout trainer, for what the USAAF called a advanced trainer. It looks like "SN" was only used from 1939-1946 when all trainers were designated "T".

My guess was it was a quick way to designate the newer more advanced trainers they Navy needed to get pilots up to speed for the newer,faster, more modern fighters that started to appear at the outbreak of the war. The USN had a very convoluted way of designating aircraft right up till the common system applied in the 1960's. Considering the "T" was unused in 1939, I can't even begin to guess why they didn't use that for trainers. I blame it on a bunch of old salty Admirals sitting around a desk trying to figure out how to designate these new fangled flying machines..lol.

Sean


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 559
Location: Shalimar, FL
In doing some further reading, it may be that the SNJ and SNB are aircraft that can either be used as Scouts and also as trainers. Remember, the C-45 was used as a reconnaissance platform as F-2s and the SNJ's to train observers. Just some musings...

_________________
Cheers!

Lance Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:13 pm
Posts: 268
Location: Virginia, US
Along the same lines, the Army AT-6 versions were preceded by the BC (Basic Combat)-1 and BC-2. The BC-1 was the equivalent of the SNJ-1 and the Harvard 1.

Richard

_________________
I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:05 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2628
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
A retired Navy controller told me as a kid that SNB stood for “slow Navy bomber” and SNJ stood for “Slow Navy Jet.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 6:13 pm
Posts: 268
Location: Virginia, US
:lol: :lol:

_________________
I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:08 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2628
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
A retired Navy controller told me as a kid that SNB stood for “slow Navy bomber” and SNJ stood for “Slow Navy Jet.”


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2014 5:46 pm
Posts: 456
Location: Texas
Didn’t they have a machine gun in one or both wings?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SNJ, SNB question
PostPosted: Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:15 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
They generally had various armament configurations...most common was a synchronized gun in the right cowl, a .30 in the right wing and many had a flexible gun in the back seat. Plus some had provision for carrying small bombs.

T-6Gs could have gun pods, rockets or bombs.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group