Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 3:32 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 21, 2018 3:27 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7557
Not sure what's the deal going on in this photo.
Someone posted the following: "Photographic target to test the clarity of the photos taken from an aircraft."

Image

Image

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 6:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 334
The serial in the subject header is incorrect - it should read A2115. The joint BARG/Air-Britain book on Royal Navy Instructional Airframes lists it as a Seafire F.15 not a Mv.VII (sic) as in the header. It goes on to say "At Arbroath 1950, coded J. At Farnborough 9.51 semi-derelict with 13 short blades on top of fuselage. Still there 9.53". Unfortunately it does not elaborate on the purpose of the blades. The earlier BARG book with the same name gives exactly the same information. There is no indication of the Seafire's original serial in either book.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 334
There is a longer thread on this topic here https://forum.keypublishing.com/forum/h ... ing-tested which I had not previously noticed.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:51 am
Posts: 46
The scheme looks similar to other schemes that were used in film test that allowed engineers to calculate the exact speed of filmed events.

I don’t think the blade was cut down. Looks like it was ground down in a gear up landing. The tail wheel is extended, the maingear is out of the well,and the scoop on the cowling appears ground down. Maybe a gear up landing with the engine shutdown and a prop made from material other than metal and or wood. Looking closely at the pavement behind the prop and airplane there seems to be skid marks.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 22, 2018 5:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
...and the rudder lock in place.

Note the vandalism to the rudder fabric.

This Seafire XV has not just made a wheels up landing.

PeterA


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 4:59 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
The 'A' number indicates that this is a 'Ground Instructional' airframe of the Royal Navy. Strictly non-flying.

Lee Howard advises:- Catapult trials, the lamps in between the vertical fin plates were used for camera calibration testing.

Here a later shot, minus outer wings, when the Seafire was consigned to the scrap area at Farnborough in the early 1950's.

PeterA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 534
Location: UK
Shame we can't make out those numbers on the fin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 2:34 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:54 am
Posts: 1073
Location: UK
paulmcmillan wrote:
Shame we can't make out those numbers on the fin


Looks to be 'FL' sub-contractor to 'CO' main contractor Cunliffe Owen.

PeterA

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 534
Location: UK
Peter


So is Cunliffe Owen must barrow the choice down a bit?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 534
Location: UK
PR338 to PR379
PR391 to PR436
PR449 to PR479
PR492 to PR552

“First 50 fitted with “A Frame” arrester hooks, remainder sting type gear

Ok so what arresting type is that I the photo?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 534
Location: UK
“J” could this be 803 Sqn Notts Corner which had a number of similar codes Seafire xV?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 4:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:42 am
Posts: 534
Location: UK
A Frame according to Flypast Forum


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 23, 2018 7:19 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4699
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
paulmcmillan wrote:
A Frame according to Flypast Forum

Isn't that an A-fame arrestor lowered below the roundel in PeterA's 1st photo above?

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: phil65, sledge39 and 191 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group