Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:33 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 10:52 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2520
A couple of early B-24's........

Dated June 6, 1942. Damaged LB-30 (may be Kodiak, AK). Photo contains LB-30, B-18, P-39 and F4F.
Image
Image

Simply marked "B-24 Liberator(converted to Transport)". Looks like the British fin flashes have been over painted on the tail.
Image

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 1:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
CAPFlyer wrote:
Minor correction Brad- all B-24s built for and delivered to the British received an LB-30 designation, all the way past the LB-30 Liberator VIII now known as "Witchcraft".


I was alluding to the fact that the British recieved a couple of models of the B-24, not just the "A" designated as LB-30.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 4:14 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
Ahh, my apologies. Misunderstood.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 5:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
mike furline wrote:
A couple of early B-24's........




Image
Image


San Diego. The sawtooth roofed buildings in the background are still there.


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 21, 2018 8:02 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Galveston County
Brad, thanks a million - I always savor DL/927 discussions. Such a perfectly wonderful warbird - the more you know about it, the more astounding it becomes. My own personal favorite daydream for that bird is a properly short B-24 A nose, more than bomb bay. 8)

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 11:41 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 4:40 pm
Posts: 68
Location: south jersey
I personally don't get the whole, it needs to have a bomb bay put back in her. She is what she is, and has been bomb bay less, for way more time then she had a bomb bay. She has a really neat history, let her have her belly so she can tell the story of what she was and is.

_________________
I once got a ride in FiFi, that i can never forget.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 6:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:44 pm
Posts: 305
If the main purpose of 927 is giving rides, reinstalling the bomb doors and the racks (thus removing the seating in the process) is going to put a major crimp in that.

If you going to take it to that level, then while you're at, go ahead, re-route the control cables, and install an fully accurate B-24A cockpit and nose section. No more of this halfway stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 7:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 3399
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas, USA
While doing the bomb bays is fairly doable with money to offset the time, doing the nose really isn't. It would require significant reworking and creation of structure to fix, including redoing the entire cockpit window area as they were part of what was replaced during the war when they put the R3Y nose on. Additionally, that change was done for safety of flight reasons more than anything. The short-nose B-24 was known for being pretty sensitive in longitude and a narrow CG envelope. That is why the nose was extended with the B-24D (the first full production model). It didn't fully fix the problem, but it made it much more manageable. Gary was pretty clear that while he wanted to put the gun ring in and put the doors back on eventually, the nose and cockpit windows were staying because they were safety improvements.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2018 8:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1332
Location: Galveston County
pontiac58 wrote:
She is what she is, and has been bomb bay less, for way more time then she had a bomb bay. She has a really neat history...

^^^ Yep! 8)

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 10:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 11, 2009 11:36 am
Posts: 559
Location: Shalimar, FL
Yep! A B24ALB30C87

_________________
Cheers!

Lance Jones


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 11:44 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
Pogmusic wrote:
Yep! A B24ALB30C87


Diamond Lil was never a C-87. She was the prototype for the prototype C-87. C-87s, except for the prototype were purpose built from the factory as C-87s.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:02 pm
Posts: 284
'Diamond Lil' was the first WWII aircraft I ever saw up close. She and 'FIFI' staged through Rochester, in the fall of 1983, and I went out to the airport to take a look. Of course I was quite impressed- even though I didn't know her history. By the next year I was attending the (then-new) airshow at Geneseo, and it's been downhill from there.
Given Diamond Lil's history, It makes no sense to try and turn her into something she never was. I understand the desire to have a flying B-24D, but please, not on this airframe.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
Mark Sampson wrote:
I understand the desire to have a flying B-24D, but please, not on this airframe.


There is no plan or desire to turn Diamond Lil into a B-24D. She is not and never was one. The desire is to someday put her back in true, or as close as possible, B-24A configuration. That is the configuration she would have been in with the US had the airplane not been sold to the British. The A & D are totally different airplanes. The nose glass makes people think they are the same. But they aren’t.

Equally challenging and expensive would be to put Lil back into the LB-30 configuration that she was in when accepted by the British. That is essentially, as I said earlier, a B-24A with British standard bomb shackles, radios, weapons, Sperry bombsight and British markings over the US markings.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:07 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
JFS61 wrote:
If the main purpose of 927 is giving rides, reinstalling the bomb doors and the racks (thus removing the seating in the process) is going to put a major crimp in that.


It wouldn’t hamper the ride program. The seats would be relocated and the show would go on. Pretty much the way the Collings Foundation does with their B-24.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2018 2:20 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:30 pm
Posts: 1129
pontiac58 wrote:
I personally don't get the whole, it needs to have a bomb bay put back in her. She is what she is, and has been bomb bay less, for way more time then she had a bomb bay. She has a really neat history, let her have her belly so she can tell the story of what she was and is.


She had a very plush executive interior far longer than she had a bomb bay or military cargo configuration. Even longer than that, she had a couple of different civilian versions of military paint jobs with varying degrees of executive interior and semi military/civilian interior. The intent and very long term plan is to put her back, as close as possible, to the condition she would have been in had she gone to the Americans when delivered as a fully configured bomber, instead of going to the British, as a fully configured bomber.

_________________
Brad


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 50 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dhfan and 100 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group