quemerford wrote:
The 'easiest' way would be to hope that '843 is the last three of the USAAF s/n (which it sometimes is). Then if you use a site like Baugher's USAF s/n listing you'll be able to list all AT-6s which had a last three of 843. There are likely to be a fair few, but so long as that 'last three' is indeed the final numbers of the a/c serial number, you'll 'only' have to request 10 or 20 record cards instead of trawling through thousands of AT-6 IARC's.
However I couldn't guarantee that the 'E-843' wasn't just a field-assigned number, so a bit of research would be needed before you get too carried away.
Not the case with recent research of my own.
JohnB wrote:
I'm no expert, but in my casual viewing, I don't think many airfield numbers...like E-843...corresponded to the aircraft serial.
Recent experience of my research has been in line with JohnB, that is, no correlation between fuselage code and USAAC/USAAF serial number. Consider BT-13A s/n 41-11538, as described in some detail in this post (and entire thread);
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=57585&start=15#p597606This aircraft was assigned to Greenville Army Airfield. Other fields may have operated differently.
An accident report from Greenville showing fuselage code and serial number (referenced in the above post).
https://www.flickr.com/photos/85883490@N00/albums/72157688327610631If only it were that easy...
Post-war, radio call signs were based on aircraft serial numbers thus a correlation can be made, as described in Chuck Cravens book "Combat Vet P-51, The History of Sierra Sue II, World War II Survivor". This is evidenced on Korean War area B-26's (Douglas A-26 Invaders redesignated B-26) operating out of Kunsan.
Jordan