Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 11:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 22  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 10:38 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Sure all things to be considered and most likely the case. But in the past when the NHC and Mother NAVY have gotten together good things have happen in the name history. A' La USS Monitor turret through the talented efforts of USS Grasp and crew. The Lexington aircrafts' remarkable state of preservation and historical significance combined with the revelation that they are not considered war graves, I would not be surprised if some ideas are being floated around at NHC HQ :)

Image

Shay
_______________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 07, 2018 11:34 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: Minnesota, USA
Shay wrote:

Trust me, after 5 years of working across the street from Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit Two (MDSU-2) , USS Grapple and USS Grasp and seen the things theyve brought up from the bottom. The U.S. Navy has plenty of EXPERTS. ☺

Shay
_________________
SEMPER FORTIS



I trust you. The Navy? Not as much.

Please note that it has been reported that personnel of both MDSU-1 and MDSU-2 were responsible for tearing PBM-5 BuNo 59172 in two during training exercises in 1996. As mentioned, I would personally prefer that the EXPERTS of the Navy's MDSU's gain their expertise practicing their trade on historically-less-significant airframes.

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/u ... 59172.html

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 3:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 24
airnutz wrote:
Mark Allen M wrote:
The hits just keep coming ...

Image
An undetonated torpedo near the wreckage site. Of the 5 torpedoes USS Phelps launched to scuttle the USS Lexington, Believed this was likely one of the two that were duds.

At first I thought this was a Japanese "Long Lance" due to its length, but with closer attention to details it does appear to be the Mk 15 commonly used by US destroyers and PT's at the time. About 3.5' longer than the Mk 14, the Lance was longer yet at about 29'. The Mk 15 had the same problems as the sub-launched Mk 14 mostly centered around the Mk 6 exploder. We were still using a later mod Mk 14(we also had the Mk 37 acoustic wire-guided and '45 nuke) in diesel submarines when I left the service in '77, tho I understand '14's were phased out by 1980.
I'd like to see what the nose looks like, it's probably caved in from a direct strike(or possibly the bottom after dudding)...which would fall in with one of its other faults with depth control issues.


it is dud torpedo from DD Phelps


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:38 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Dan K wrote:
I trust you. The Navy? Not as much.

Please note that it has been reported that personnel of both MDSU-1 and MDSU-2 were responsible for tearing PBM-5 BuNo 59172 in two during training exercises in 1996. As mentioned, I would personally prefer that the EXPERTS of the Navy's MDSU's gain their expertise practicing their trade on historically-less-significant airframes.

https://www.history.navy.mil/research/u ... 59172.html


Dan

That was 22 years ago, I'm sure lessons have been learned. This was ultimately a training evolution for Active and Naval Reserve components of the MDSU Teams. But to believe that Navy personnel did not try their hardest or not care enough to take the proper precautions about a piece of Navy history is a little disingenuous. "The best-laid plans of mice and men often go awry."

To be completely fair, when considering the PBM's large & unique design, condition after decades of tampering, attitude of the wreck site and Time!, I think it was overly optimistic to believe that it would've be recovered and righted unscathed. Also it would be equally unrealistic not to expect that when the PBM initially set down on the lake bed upside down, with all the aircraft's weight and pressure on the higher and less robust empennage, there would not be some structural damage.

That being the case, like Glacier Girl, hopefully the smaller and sturdier single engine aircraft of the Lexington will withstand the recovery better. The real challenge will be the depth and pressure. 2 miles is a long way down. That's a long distance to coordinate a recovery remotely. Not to mention the weight of 2 miles of cable must be tremendous. At that pressure float bags may be problematic, especially with O2. Perhaps with oil or diesel, but i'm not sure Mr Allen and others would allow that due to the environmental impact should things go "awry".

Regardless, it will take a severe amount of mechanical engineering and planning to come up with a positive solution that will result in recovered and further undamaged aircraft for display. Personally I'd like to see them preserved and displayed as found. As well I'd like to see Lady Lex's stern plate and bell recovered.

Best of Luck and l look forward to further news.

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:06 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4700
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
dakoblue wrote:
airnutz wrote:
Mark Allen M wrote:
The hits just keep coming ...

An undetonated torpedo near the wreckage site. Of the 5 torpedoes USS Phelps launched to scuttle the USS Lexington, Believed this was likely one of the two that were duds.

At first I thought this was a Japanese "Long Lance" due to its length, but with closer attention to details it does appear to be the Mk 15 commonly used by US destroyers and PT's at the time. About 3.5' longer than the Mk 14, the Lance was longer yet at about 29'. The Mk 15 had the same problems as the sub-launched Mk 14 mostly centered around the Mk 6 exploder. We were still using a later mod Mk 14(we also had the Mk 37 acoustic wire-guided and '45 nuke) in diesel submarines when I left the service in '77, tho I understand '14's were phased out by 1980.
I'd like to see what the nose looks like, it's probably caved in from a direct strike(or possibly the bottom after dudding)...which would fall in with one of its other faults with depth control issues.


it is dud torpedo from DD Phelps

Thanks for the verification Dakoblue, as I noted, I was agreeing with Mark that it was one of 2 duds from Phelps

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:10 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1524
Location: Williamsburg, VA
There are apparently rumblings that the NMNA is "very interested" in these aircraft- I know a TBD has been at the absolute top of their wish list for almost 30 years now, probably longer, and I can absolutely guarantee you that we aren't the only ones seeing stars in our eyes at the utterly remarkable state of preservation of these aircraft.

All it takes is cubic money.

Others have already said it, but I'll echo it- a public/private partnership is the most realistic way forward in retrieving these aircraft. As much as I love the TBD, I would be first in line with a pitchfork if someone tried to restore one of these airframes to airworthy condition- they meet every qualification for preservation as opposed to airworthy restoration, as each of them is incredibly historically significant in their own right. Now, if all seven are retrieved, I would not be opposed to seeing the least damaged one sympathetically restored to how it appeared the day of the battle, but that's a conversation for much, much further down the road.

Obviously I'm not privy to conversations and decisions at the NHC, but I'll bet there are a lot of folks having some VERY significant conversations about right now in the halls of the NMNA and NHC. For now, let's bask in this and wait to see what else the team has to show us... remember, there are still 3 other TBDs and 3 SBDs which we haven't even seen yet. :)

Cheers,

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:12 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1236
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
Hopefully a certain group we're all too familiar with who's never accomplished anything other than to muck things up for others and shoot their mouth off will stay out of this, but I doubt it.

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 10:33 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4700
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Dan Jones wrote:
Hopefully a certain group we're all too familiar with who's never accomplished anything other than to muck things up for others and shoot their mouth off will stay out of this, but I doubt it.

Hopefully they stepped on someone's last nerve when they co-oped with the Navy on the Jaluit TBD survey...

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 8:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
Unreal some of the knuckleheads on facebook that are rudely hounding the guys on the 'RV Petrel' for more photos and video faster and with more precision. Jesus-H-C give them some time. They don't have to be doing any of this for us you know. Disclaimer: I'm directing this post to those who are following this thread from facebook and other sites that know about and are following WIX's conversation. Everyone here on WIX and most on many other facebook pages are being considerate, but there's always a few boneheads who just can't seem to get it and feel the need to be idiots. One guy is actually annoyed that Paul Allen and the guys on the RV Petral don't have a full time PR person in charge of feeding us photo updates 24/7. FWIW I've been in contact with the RV Petral folks and they've got plenty more coming in due time. Just hang on people. We all want to see as much as possible as soon as possible, but please be respectful of those guys. This is their gift to us and Paul Allen and his group really don't owe us anything. I'll post anything that I see as soon as I see it for those who don't do facebook. You'll get it here on WIX asap.

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 9:16 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 1333
Location: Galveston County
Mark Allen M wrote:
I'll post anything that I see as soon as I see it for those who don't do facebook. You'll get it here on WIX asap.

Bless you, Mark!

Bless Paul Allen & Crew too -- those guys and gals are FREAKIN' AWESOME!!! 8) :supz:

_________________
Cheers,
Kurt Maurer
League City, Texas

PIC, Ford 6600 pulling Rhino batwing up and down the runway


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:01 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2373
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Hummmmm....how many years did it took for Glacier Girl????

- From discovery
- To reccovery
- To flight.....(or display in this case)

May be dead before I see it.....

Anything can be done. Just takes time and $.....and the will to do it!

BTW...FuC%$#$I?&?*&n%?&$?%@ amazing.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 6:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 4:13 pm
Posts: 24
Mark Allen M wrote:
As for the F4F? Here's a quote "It's Lieut. Noel A. M. Gayler's F4F-3 without any doubt! VF-2 XO during the Coral Sea Battle.

1. The visible letters of pilot's name under the canopy: GA****R.

2. Four IJN flags. Gayler shoot down THREE Mitsubishi G4M "Betties" (including 2 in group) during the abortive raid on Rabaul February 2, 1942. Then he shoot down ONE Nakajima E8N floatplane during the Lae-Salamoua raid March 8, 1942. So he had exactly FOUR victories before Coral Sea battle.

3. "Bomb" mark. During the Lae-Salamoua raid Gayler's division of F4F's attacked the Japanese AA positions with 30-lb bombs.

4. Lieut. Noel A. M. Gayler was one of the 12 VF-3 pilots (with 19 F4F-3 planes with Felix cats) transfered to VF-2 just before the battle of Coral Sea.

5. Lieut. Noel A. M. Gayler was one of the 9 VF-2 pilots on board "Lady Lex" when the ship was lost, so his plane have to be there too.

F4F wing?
Image


how about this
https://books.google.pl/books?id=pouHCw ... se&f=false


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:30 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
That's a good theory as well, but I'm leaning towards Gayler simply because when there is no concrete evidence, one must go with the best of all possible data that can be determined as close to fact. The closeup photo of the F4F's cockpit area IMHO shows pretty clearly the letters 'G' and 'R'. This is all I have for proof so I'll have to believe it was Gayler's (at least in name)

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:36 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7566
Another mosaic just posted by the 'RV Petrel' folks

"We try our best to make sure everything we post is accurate but in the case of the previously posted mosaic I made a mistake in the measurement of the Bow and Stern from the main portion of the wreck. It is only 500 meters or .26 of a nautical mile and not the 1 nautical mile as stated."

Image

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2018 9:44 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1173
Location: Tulsa, OK
Can someone here educate me on how the sinking of the Lexington happened? Brief overview is fine, but what I was trying to understand was a couple of questions:
The aircraft are separate from the main body of the wreck. Usually the main body of the wreck, being heavy, is where the sinking happened. Debris fields spread out when the depth is huge. So did the airplanes flutter down after the Lex rolled over? Or were they specifically ditched before the Lex was sunk by the torpedoes?
Was there any time to remove aircraft from the Lex after it started burning? Were flight ops cancelled because of the pitch of the deck?
How long after the battle was over was the Lex sunk? Did it sit there floating for a bit or was it pretty immediate?
The Navy has been very specific about the aircraft themselves not being war graves, though the Lex is considered to be one. Was there not an ability following the battle to remove bodies from the Lex?
Just curious, and know that someone here knows the answer to these questions. No rush, just things that I have been wondering about.
kevin

_________________
FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 322 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 22  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], kalamazookid and 280 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group