Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 12:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
What about the Westland Lysander ? BUT, MAYBE,.. with an American engine & prop ?? geek pop2
& Thanks everyone ! for your input !!

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:13 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
Okay, be that we've listed the impossible (B-36), and the foreign minor types/oddities that no one...even in their home countries...wants to spend (waste..since unlike a Spitfire or Mustang they'd likely be a hard sell once the builder is done with it) their money to build, what's realistic?

So, more Mosquitos coming from NZ,
a real-metal Kingfisher, a shark fin B-17, and several pre-sold P-12s under construction (but many years late), what's in the pipeline?

-Anyone know if the tooling still exists for the H-1 replica?
-Some tooling (molds I understand) for a Lockheed Vega are out there...any work on that...which is a realistic project.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 6:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
TBM Tony wrote:
What about the Westland Lysander ? BUT, MAYBE,.. with an American engine & prop ??


I hate to sound negative, but if anyone wanted one...or had a use for one... they wouldn't have been scrapped.

After the war there were many in Canada..you'd think with their large fuselage and low price, someone would have used them as bush planes if they were at all practical for civil use. After all, a few bush pilots got their start with surplus L-2,3,4s, so the bar was set fairly low in terms of space and payload.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 11, 2017 7:35 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2628
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
The Lysander was a childhood favorite. However , most Brits and Europeans consider it a travesty to put an incorrect engine in a restoration. Confirmed this with a British auto enthusiast friend. This is a big reason why the Lysander disappeared quickly from the post war civil scene. (Bad engine)
There are really only a couple of Hi-61 Tony projects and they have been around for many decades. In Kermit’s engine video it sounds like there’s maybe one good engine core and a lot of bits and pieces retrieved from the Pacific decades after the war. So a restoration to airworthy will require a rebuilt DB601 with cowlings etc. plus a fortune reconstructing the airframes . Four to five million bucks?
I’ve always wondered if there’s a market for the wooden/ plywood/ Duramold/ etc . Rebuilds like the
Lockheed Vega, Timm N2T-1, Culver PQ-12 and PQ-14, Bucker Bu181 Bestmann and other. The market isn’t there yet but it’d be nice to see a shop build up a run of fully rebuilt to new standards, Navy N3Ns
If you get a chance to see the Curtiss F9C Sparrowhawk, it would be a worthy aircraft to replicate. Small and built light, would be a superb aerobatic performer.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 12:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1429
Location: North Texas
Marine: The Duramold stuff would be fun, but you would need to have enough hard commitments to be able to build a set of production tooling for the skins. Even doing a set of unheated concrete molds would set a shop back somewhere in the $250K+ range for the Vega, and it's a pretty simple shape. For proper bonding with a wet layup, the molds need to be able to sustain molding pressures in the 40-60 PSIG range, over the entire mold surface. The exception would be, if you could find the correct composition and manufacturing data for the RF cured sheet glue that was used during the war. With that, though, you would need to be able to afford to generate about 30-50kW of microwave energy in a controlled cavity to pass a wooden form set through.

Unfortunately, there are probably not enough of us that like the weird wood airplanes that would or could cough up the capital to do a production run of any of them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 2:33 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
JohnB wrote:
TBM Tony wrote:
What about the Westland Lysander ? BUT, MAYBE,.. with an American engine & prop ??


I hate to sound negative, but if anyone wanted one...or had a use for one... they wouldn't have been scrapped.

After the war there were many in Canada..you'd think with their large fuselage and low price, someone would have used them as bush planes if they were at all practical for civil use. After all, a few bush pilots got their start with surplus L-2,3,4s, so the bar was set fairly low in terms of space and payload.


Think that is missing the point about warbirds today. I think there would be a decent amount of interest is seeing a Lysander restoration or reproduction today. Just because they were not popular post war and put into wide spread civil use does not mean they would not be popular today. There were cheaper (to operate) and perhaps better bush planes that were put into service. We had all kinds of types that no body "wanted" post war, but would be highly sought after today. Heck mosquitos were literally put out to pasture in Canada, but I think you find the are quite popular now. No one wanted early B-17s, no one wanted Black Widows, no one wanted Shakletons, Stukas.....

I would love to see one- big and impressive, with cloak and dagger type insertions conducted by the type, what's not to like? Our UK friends would go wild over some flying examples. I'd much rather see a Lysander over a L type or another bush plane....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 4:15 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2128
Location: Utah
ErrolC wrote:
KiwiZac wrote:
Jesse C. wrote:
Kawasaki Ki-61 Hien Fighter - Keep hearing about a couple being done, but nothing yet.

Like the OS2U, one or two coming from NZ in time.


Current status:

ImageKingfisher project at Pioneer Aero by Errol Cavit, on Flickr



Is this progressing or sitting? The Beatles were wrong - all it takes is money! pop2

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 536
Location: Auckland, NZ
wendovertom wrote:

Is this progressing or sitting? The Beatles were wrong - all it takes is money! pop2

Tom P.


Kingfisher is currently sitting (upside-down). P-39Q is main focus, and preparation for Sea Hornet.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 12, 2017 11:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
sandiego89 wrote:

Think that is missing the point about warbirds today. I think there would be a decent amount of interest is seeing a Lysander restoration or reproduction today. Just because they were not popular post war and put into wide spread civil use does not mean they would not be popular today. There were cheaper (to operate) and perhaps better bush planes that were put into service. We had all kinds of types that no body "wanted" post war, but would be highly sought after today. Heck mosquitos were literally put out to pasture in Canada, but I think you find the are quite popular today...


I understand what you're saying, it's frequently said on the Key Publishing forum. The fact remains, there is a lot of money in the UK warbird community. If there was a market for a Lysander, someone would restore or build one (and yes the basically unsupportable engine would be a problem).

Witness the lack of Mosquitos flying in the UK. You would think there would be more in the UK than US.
It looks to me like the UK warbird community has lots of money to spend on Spitfires/Hurricanes/Mustangs etc. but not a lot for weird stuff.
The flying rare items seems to owned by groups (Shuttleworth or the Blenheim groups name two).

I imagine the "rich guys" find it more rewarding to say at their private club "I have a Spitfire" than saying "I have a Lysander"...then having to spend the next 10 minutes saying what a Lysander is. :)

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 12:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:31 am
Posts: 271
Location: Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
I totally agree John.

Barry

_________________
Little Johnny : "When I grow up I want to be a pilot!"

Johnny's Mother : "Don't be silly Dear - you can't do both!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 9:36 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1378
I'd have to disagree on the argument: pilots love to yak on, so any excuse to 'explain' what a Lysander is would be seen as a bonus.

As the saying goes, "How do you know if there is a pilot in the room? - They'll tell you".

:)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 4:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
:drink3: Thanks Again everyone ! ( I'm beginning to sound like Tiny Tim :lol: ) on the spirited insights of the Lysander etc.. I agree that a "Restored" Lysander would/should have the original type engine & prop, But I'm talking about a " Reproduction ", a Brand New 2018 ( or '19,'20,'21....) that would have NO pedigree what so ever than the shape. Then, I could see an American engine & prop, much like Most of the Flying Japanese fighters we have today. Still. I'm a HUGH Fan of the Centaurus engine on a Hawker Fury/Sea Fury, but I DO understand how operators of the type have installed 3350s & 2800s ( kinda sad to see The Fighter Collection do so, but they do seem VERY please with the 2800).. I'll just dream on about flying down in my all Black Lysander, dropping off Aliens onto U.S farm fields to create their circles ! geek pop2

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 13, 2017 8:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
I suppose the Allison V1710 is the best candidate but I wonder about length and weight. I have heard about some marine V-12s that supposedly mimic some of the aviation V-12s. Then you are looking at developing both an aircraft and an engine on the same project rarely a good idea.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
JohnB wrote:
I imagine the "rich guys" find it more rewarding to say at their private club "I have a Spitfire" than saying "I have a Lysander"...


Well you have the "rich guys" and the "really rich guys" :D ....and I do think there are certain bragging rights to having something no-one else has....

Perhaps like the car crowd, with hobbyists (in the US) first buying a Ford Mustang, GTO, Corvette, etc. Then you get to the next tier and they get Ferraris and Superbirds, THEN you get to the guys that want something no else has and you get the bragging rights of having something ultra rare and unique...

Most aviation collectors may start with the iconic Mustangs and Sptifires, heck even some well off dentists and doctors have had a Mustang, but we seem to only have a few (Paul Allen, Jerry Yagen, etc) that have the resources to fund wider collections and the really big bucks for those more obscure types... thank goodness for them!!! Bring on the Stuka's, KingFishers, Lysanders....!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2017 10:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 16, 2013 5:29 am
Posts: 115
Location: NAS Pax River
TBD-1 Devastator

Image

As a Warbird, probably one of the most historical in terms of contributing to the victory of a single battle.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 60 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 92 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group