Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 9:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 8:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 520
Location: Travis AFB
Pictures Emerge Of Covered F-117 Being Transported On A Trailer In Southern Nevada

The photos come as another sign that the F-117 program is finally winding down once and for all.

http://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/16092/pictures-emerge-of-covered-f-117-being-transported-on-a-trailer-in-southern-nevada


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:15 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1089
Location: Caribou, Maine
One of these will surely wind up in the Smithsonian, but whether that would be one of the early or late retirees is the question.

Kevin

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Thu Nov 16, 2017 5:30 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1440
Location: Blenheim, NZ
I'm sorry to see this. I can't remember if it was here or another forum, but I always get a kick out of seeing a new video on YouTube of an F-117 being taken up to blow away the cobwebs. What a cool job that would be!

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:14 pm
Posts: 72
If the F-117 is done

There must be some bad ass stuff thats been out there for many years that the public knows nothing about

Hmmmmmm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 17, 2017 4:49 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 1933
Location: Meriden,Ct.
F-22 and F-35...

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 3:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 235
Isn't it a slow plane? Funny how the old stuff is still state of the art, like the B1.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 27, 2017 10:34 pm 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1440
Location: Blenheim, NZ
Wikipedia says 617mph is both the max and cruise speed, so I'm afraid my attempt to answer the "isn't it a slow plane?" question isn't helpful!

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 10:55 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
exhaustgases wrote:
Isn't it a slow plane? Funny how the old stuff is still state of the art, like the B1.


No it was not very fast, but it really did not matter. It did not need to be fast as a low observable aircraft flying almost exclusively at night. It surely got the job done in some very contested airspace. The shoot down over Yugoslavia was in large part to poor tactics by the USAF (overflying the same routes, and flying over the target numerous times- a real no no).

The B-2 is not very fast either. And the B-1B is quite a bit slower than the originally designed B-1 when the decision was made to focus on low level penetration, and reduced radar cross section. While increased speed had been the focus for many bomber and attack programs of the 1950's and 1960's (such as the F-105, Vigilante, B-70 and B-58 programs), low level and reduced radar cross section become more important and we got programs such as the B-1B, B-2, F-117, A-12 (cancelled), F-35 and a few black programs. None are especially fast, but all are quite capable. Rumors and desire for a hypersonic bomber still persist.

The F-117 seems to have been a well executed program.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 11:41 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 1933
Location: Meriden,Ct.
"Rumors and desire for a hypersonic bomber still persist"

Stick a few P&W F-119's on a B-1, done.. :supz:

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 1:56 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4961
Location: PA
I was never a fan of the F-117.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 28, 2017 7:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2009 9:37 pm
Posts: 278
Location: Perth Western Australia
For me the F-117 was a ground breaking plane in it's reliance on stealth and it's successful use of that attribute in the Gulf.
The pioneer role it played in introducing stealth technology resulted in it being slow, cumbersome and weird looking and this added to its uniqueness, as did the secrecy and mystery that surrounded it in the early days.
Whether you believe that stealth is the future or a dead end, the F-117 was significant.

_________________
Chris Mellor


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 12:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 6:26 pm
Posts: 235
I think the B1 is the best looking of all, maybe they could change up the tail a bit and give it a power boost, still faster than all the other bombers.
IMO F117 and the bomber huge $ waste.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 11:18 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11276
Rick65 wrote:
For me the F-117 was a ground breaking plane in it's reliance on stealth and it's successful use of that attribute in the Gulf.
The pioneer role it played in introducing stealth technology resulted in it being slow, cumbersome and weird looking and this added to its uniqueness, as did the secrecy and mystery that surrounded it in the early days.
Whether you believe that stealth is the future or a dead end, the F-117 was significant.


And don't forget the computer stabilized (artificial stability) flight control system.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:13 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
exhaustgases wrote:
I think the B1 is the best looking of all, maybe they could change up the tail a bit and give it a power boost, still faster than all the other bombers.
IMO F117 and the bomber huge $ waste.


Hmm, in my opinion "effective" is much more important than being pretty or fast. The F-117, B-2 (and A-10 and A-6) are classic examples of being neither especially fast or pretty, but they sure got the got job done- often going "downtown" or in higher threat environments where other aircraft would have been shot out the sky. A bigger "waste" would be sending crews into higher threat areas without the best equipment. Yes they are costly, but less costly than having useless aircraft, or crews sent to the slaughter. Of course when you are in a permissive environment you can use much cheaper aircraft- but we cant assume we will always be in a permissive war.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: The end of F-117s?
PostPosted: Wed Nov 29, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 31, 2005 1:40 pm
Posts: 936
Location: Deer Park, NY
exhaustgases wrote:
I think the B1 is the best looking of all, maybe they could change up the tail a bit and give it a power boost, still faster than all the other bombers.
IMO F117 and the bomber huge $ waste.


The F-117?! I think those pilots that went into downtown Baghdad on the first night of ODS would wholeheartedly disagree with you. Every target hit, no loses and they never saw them coming in what was the most highly defended target area since Hanoi. What would've been the outcome if they used Strike Eagles or F-111s?

The B-2? Let's face it. If push comes to shove and a bunker buster or low level yield nuke needs to be dropped on North Korea or Iran, it will be done by the B-2.

If there was a waste it is the B-1. It was canceled. The only reason Reagan revived it was to spend the Soviets into oblivion in the 1980's. The money should have been put toward more B-2's.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 92 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group