HHmmm, Yanks is now changing their story:
https://yanksair.org/chino-airport-tena ... -air-show/Also, on facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/YanksAirMuseum/1) From the press release above from Yanks,
Misrepresentation #1: "The group of tenants suing the operators of the annual Planes of Fame Air Show is calling for the County of San Bernardino to appoint a coalition of tenants to oversee any future air shows at the Chino Airport."Yanks has not asked for a coalition of tenants, according to the publicly disclosed County of San Bernardino lawsuit documents. The list of judgments they seek in on pages 19-20, Case number DS1705434, County of San Bernardino, Superior Court, filed March 27, 2017. Getting a "coalition of tenants" is not mentioned in the lawsuit document.
2) From the press release above from Yanks,
Misrepresentation #2: "The plaintiffs are not anti-air show......They want to clarify that this suit will not end air shows at the Chino Airport."From page 19 of the same San Bernardino county public law document above, it states the plaintiffs' desired judgments:
"2. For a permanent injunction restraining Planes of Fame from operating an air show at the Chino Airport."
This latest press release from Yanks appears to me to be "damage control". They know they've lost public opinion, so they are changing their story. Their public words do not match their legal words according to publicly available legal documents.
I'm not a lawyer, but from reading the Superior Court legal documents, this is what I got from it. Anybody disagree with my assessment?