Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 1:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 8:51 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
I have read a fair amount about the Hispano Buchon version of the Messerschmitt Bf 109. I think the last version of the Buchon the HA 1112 had wings strengthened and modified for external stores in ways the Bf 109 wings were not. So when a restorer creates a new Bf 109 from a Buchon what to they do with the wings? Do they remove the extra structure and return the wings to a more original Messerschmitt style or do the leave them alone?

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 7:18 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2536
I don't know the answer to your question, but I don't recall ever seeing anything "large" carried under the wing. Just these rockets/hard points. I would guess the removal of the wing fence and gun barrel shroud would be accomplished as well. Perhaps this style wing hasn't been used for a restoration as of yet?

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 3:38 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5253
Location: Eastern Washington
I can't imagine a restorer removing structure from a wing just to make unseen areas more "original".

l

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:08 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11281
Some versions of the 109 had underwing gun pods. Perhaps other equipment used the same hardpoints?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 02, 2016 9:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 1395
Location: San Diego CA
The only reason I could see for removal of additional hard points would be weight. But, most restorations are pampered show ponies and they will not be put through the rigors of combat, thus, the weight would not matter.

Plus honestly, how many folks attending an airshow or museum would even notice this feature?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 03, 2016 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 172
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
I seem to recall that the Buchon had an extra wing spar to add strength for the 20mm wing mounted cannons.

I think there were some pictures taken during the restoration of the Yagen 109G project that showed the double spar Buchon wings that were used on the project.

Cheers

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:52 am
Posts: 318
Location: between Frankfurt and Cologne
Bradburger wrote:
I seem to recall that the Buchon had an extra wing spar to add strength for the 20mm wing mounted cannons.

I think there were some pictures taken during the restoration of the Yagen 109G project that showed the double spar Buchon wings that were used on the project.

Cheers

Paul


Paul, AFAIK it was not done to add strength. To allow the quite large Hispano-Suiza cannon to fit into the wing, they had to cut a big hole into the spar, so the additional one was neccessary to take the load. Regarding the fences, they were installed because firing the cannons could create turbulences influencing the airflöw above the wing (and to prevent interaction with the slats).
You are right, there were those pics, and the wings were not altered internally (nor were those of the 3 Buchon based G´s of Airbus / EADS / Messerschmitt Foundation).

Michael


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 05, 2016 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 23, 2005 2:20 am
Posts: 172
Location: Surrey, United Kingdom
redvanner wrote:

Paul, AFAIK it was not done to add strength. To allow the quite large Hispano-Suiza cannon to fit into the wing, they had to cut a big hole into the spar, so the additional one was neccessary to take the load. Regarding the fences, they were installed because firing the cannons could create turbulences influencing the airflöw above the wing (and to prevent interaction with the slats).
You are right, there were those pics, and the wings were not altered internally (nor were those of the 3 Buchon based G´s of Airbus / EADS / Messerschmitt Foundation).

Michael


Thanks for the clarification Michael.

I read that too about the reason for the wing fences fitted to the Buchon.

I guess you could rebuild Buchon wings to 109G specifications if you so desired for a potential BF109G project, but all at an extra expense!

Cheers

Paul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 12:34 am 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1413
Location: Everywhere
At that level of restoration a restored DB is going to be well north of 500K, the wings will be of little consequence to the overall restoration. If you look at Crazy Horse or any other Cavalier Mustang restoration you wouldn't know from outward appearances that the wings had any modifications. The same goes for B-17s that were modified for fire bombing...there are small mods that, unless you are intimately familiar with the airframe you'd never know otherwise.


Jim

_________________
www.spiritof44.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:52 am
Posts: 318
Location: between Frankfurt and Cologne
If the wing fence and the hardpoints are removed, you can tell a Buchon wing from an original Bf 109 G wing (from the outside) only by several rows of additional rivets. That´s it. If the Buchon wing is any stronger than an original G one, I have no idea. Depends on if the second spar only restored the original strength weakened for use of the Hispano-Suiza HS 404 20 mm cannon, or if they added some (might be, due to the (Oerlikon) rockets fixed to the hardpoints).


Michael

P.S.: A link to the relevant pic on MeierMotors homepage. Please follow the link to see the pic.

http://www.meiermotors.com/images/pictu ... 9-0225.jpg


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1413
Location: Everywhere
Had a good conversation with a NW Warbird restorer today...he said there is a significant lack of strength between the Buchon and the original ME wings. As noted there was a good chunk of spar removed for the cannon. At this point in the game I'm sure most restorations will be receiving new spars anyway...but that is just my speculation.

jim

_________________
www.spiritof44.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blurrkup, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 116 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group