JohnB wrote:
Your points are fair, but you overlooked my main point.
Many people visiting it Wil be tourists doing the typical "DC tour".
Just a guess that there not like those of us who frequent by his forum. For many, probably the majority the NASM will be the only aviation museum they'll ever visit. I don't expect them to hit the road and make a special trip to a museum just to see a B-17 or whatever.
To me a place with the word "National" in the title implies American history and achievements...after all its not the "International Air and Space Museum".As such, I think the lack of a B-17 is particularly egregious... considering the mountainside in y first post, the numbers of Americans who built, Cleveland died in the things.
As such, I find it hard to overlook their rather large omissions...like the B-17 while finding time and space to restore oddities that have no real historic significance as a type and the only reason they're displayed because they are odd.
Leave the weird stuff (and be honest, did the aircraft named in the title of t his thread make real contributions to aeronautics...They're not exactly the DH Comet, Boeing Dash 80 or the 262) at places were serious buff and Axis fanboys can go, or a family-friendly tourist stop where they can go to a water slide and see the something akin to the Hughes flying boat (the ultimate oddity of little historic value..but no doubt a big draw at the gift shop).
I think you're focusing on a B-17, which no one here is arguing isn't a worthy part of a national collection. And they have one, and it's being restored, AND it isn't taking away from the B-26, Sikorsky, etc. that ARE being actively preserved/restored.
Did you have a chance to see the Shinden pics posted? If so, you'd see it's an interesting piece of aviation trivia that is on display now - NOT being restored actively to the detriment of whatever your pet cause is. It's simply moved from "out of view" to "in view." How is this a problem?
Also, I agree with you that when people go to DC, they're most likely to visit the NASM -- but on the Mall. Not at UH. I'm here to tell you, and if you've been you know already, it ain't easy to get to UH unless you're intending specifically to go to UH. The point being that UH is exactly the kind of place you describe where a serious "Axis fanboy" might go. And the Mall is where someone who might prefer to see mainly those aircraft significant to the U.S. might go (not that there aren't plenty of nationally significant objects at UH or foreign objects on the Mall).
But let's set aside the fact that regardless of what you consider a "National" museum should focus on, I quoted the dang statute that set it up. It provides for both preserving nationally significant artifacts and historically interesting artifacts. Both the B-17 and the Shinden fall within those mandates.
You've mentioned the B-24 as well. I'm sure they'd love to get their hands on one. But once again, how is that incongruous with pulling some artifacts in storage out of storage?
So what is really the beef here? That the Japanese/German stuff should be put away (even if not being actively restored) until all the American stuff on your wishlist is found/restored/displayed? That they should stop restoring Flak-Bait and put the B-17 in line in DC rather than somewhere else?
Apart from "'Murica. Hell Yeah!" I'm not seeing what the issue is with trotting out some Japanese bits from storage at the SAME TIME restoration on nationally significant planes is ongoing.
It's not like the moved the Wright Flyer to display bits of the Horten 229. In fact, it looks to me like they didn't displace any aircraft of national significant to move these objects onto display.