Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 1:40 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 6:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5645
Location: Minnesota, USA
https://scontent-ord1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hp ... e=5609F9B4


Can't be long now...hope they let her travel north now & then.

_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:13 pm
Posts: 67
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.

_________________
There are two kind of aircraft, fighters and targets


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 8:26 pm
Posts: 622
GregP wrote:
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.


Different airplane, different wing, different operation.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Thanks for posting that! Dan. Very Cool. I remember being in Harlingen in the Late '70s -'80s for the air shows. I bought a Red & Black Cobras Den Patch ( which I Still Have!) from the original group who wanted to Restore this Cobra. I was told by one of the main members that their "other" P-63 was headed west ( this would be the Bob Ponds "Polly" ) and that since they were not sure if the new owner was going to make it a flyer or static, they kept the better condition components of the 2 P-63s. If this was indeed the case, then it came out the best for both Birds. Bob Pond had Fighter Rebuilders, of course, replaced what needed replacing, & the CAF had a good one to start with, which by NO means was an easy restoration to get to this point now! What a Fantastic Job the Dixie Wing has done!

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 9:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:13 pm
Posts: 67
Great to see another Bell flying. The P-63 was a pretty darned good fighter that suffered from looking too much like a P-39. The P-39 itself wasn't bad down low, but losing the turbo removed any chance of it being a high-altitude anything.

_________________
There are two kind of aircraft, fighters and targets


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4321
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Is this the P-63 that had French markings back in the 70's??


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 10:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
Lynn Allen wrote:
Is this the P-63 that had French markings back in the 70's??

Yes , also "Tumbleweed ", All White with Blue & Red trim.

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 22, 2015 11:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Houston, TX
GregP wrote:
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.


Tim Savage wrote:
Different airplane, different wing, different operation.


Care to let the rest of us in on this little secret?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2015 5:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2014 12:55 pm
Posts: 491
RV8er wrote:
GregP wrote:
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.


Tim Savage wrote:
Different airplane, different wing, different operation.


Care to let the rest of us in on this little secret?

That would be the Silver, Tall Tail P-63F that had a fuel selector problem and had to execute a gear up landing at Midland. The Centex Wing's April news letter reported that the P-63 is going to a new sponsor. http://www.cafcentex.com Please correct me if I didn't get that right.

_________________
WWI & WWII Warbird Fan.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2015 8:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
GregP wrote:
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.

How do you think the operator of the plane involved in this incident, feel when he come hear and read this kind of comment ?

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2015 11:18 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 10:19 pm
Posts: 102
Location: Houston, TX
TBM Tony wrote:
That would be the Silver, Tall Tail P-63F that had a fuel selector problem and had to execute a gear up landing at Midland. The Centex Wing's April news letter reported that the P-63 is going to a new sponsor. http://www.cafcentex.com Please correct me if I didn't get that right.


Oh, that. Yep, I'm quite familiar with the story there; I was to be a part of a new sponsor group for the P-63 in the Houston area, but things got shuffled a bit... the plane is currently at Pearland being repaired. How far along it is with that I don't know.

And regarding GregPs post, his comment has no bearing on what actually happened.


Last edited by RV8er on Sat May 23, 2015 1:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 23, 2015 1:03 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 2:14 pm
Posts: 2370
Location: Atlanta, GA
Looking good, keep up the good work guys! :drink3:
Robbie 8)

_________________
Fly Fast Make Noise!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 9:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:40 am
Posts: 987
Iclo wrote:
GregP wrote:
I hope they amend the operating proceudres to check the fuel level against calculations before departing from now on.

How do you think the operator of the plane involved in this incident, feel when he come hear and read this kind of comment ?


......or would you make that comment in the presence of the pilot? Yeah, that's what I thought.


Chappie

_________________
Brrring. Dispersal? TWO SECTIONS SCRAMBLE!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 1:13 pm
Posts: 67
A fuel selector problem? It is entirely possible that what we heard was incorrect, so I'll wait to hear before opening mouth and inserting foot and farther.

I'm talking about N6763, a Bell P-93 Kingcobra that was damaged in a landing accident on 11 Sep 2013 at Sky West Airport in Texas. The cause I saw on a report was "Belly landing due to a defect of the fuel tank selector."

What we heard doesn't seem to support that, but you hear things that later turn out to be incorrect. I shall say that I am unaware as yet of the real cause of the belly landing.

_________________
There are two kind of aircraft, fighters and targets


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2015 8:57 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4321
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Lynn Allen wrote:
Is this the P-63 that had French markings back in the 70's??


Roger that and thanks. I also heard a long ago, it was a gate guard at Love Field, Dallas, Texas. anybody else hear that or know about it??


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 160 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group