Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Apr 29, 2024 6:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Falklands Birds
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 6:59 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:10 pm
Posts: 280
Location: CT
Falklands Folks:

How exactly the Argies went about to ID their kill markings on their aircraft is unclear. The link below shows an unid ship plus the HMS Invencible as targets. Photo Aeromilitar Arg/Carlos Ay Via C/w.com

http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y198/g ... 357680.jpg

Image

_________________
FAH619®


Last edited by FAH 619 on Sat Nov 26, 2005 9:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:12 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
The Argentineans did initially think that they had hit Invincible, as the pilot thought he had done so, and made the claim. There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Invincible was ever hit. The world would have known very quickly had it been so. It is, in all probability, that the claim was made because it would boost morale amongst the Argentinean pilots. They did mark one of their Super Etendards with an Invincible hit at the time. It never happened though, and with all of the evidence available contradicting it 23 years on, I find it rather strange that anyone would persist in believing that it did. Two Exocets hit Sheffield, and two hit Atlantic Conveyer. The fifth and final Exocet was not fired.... so how do you come to the conclusion that Invincible was hit by one?

Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Falklands Aircrafts
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 7:41 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:10 pm
Posts: 280
Location: CT
RMALLnut:

Rg! That clears the waters a bit. We are only showing the Argie pics sent to us sometime ago. We are still digging for more! Tks

_________________
FAH619®


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:05 pm
Posts: 258
Location: Plano, TX
As this is my first posting here, please bear with me if I inadvertently upset someone, but I felt I must post something regarding the Exocet missiles and the Falklands war.

It has been stated that 4 Exocet missiles out of the 5 that were available to the Argentineans hit 2 ships (2 on HMS Sheffied, and 2 on Atlantic Conveyor.)

No account has been taken of the Exocet missile that hit the destroyer HMS Glamorgan, and this missile was believed to have been ground launched from Stanley in the Falkland Islands.

Below is the extract from from the diaries of Air Chief Marshal Sir Peter Squire, Chief of the Air Staff, who at the time of the Falklands War was a Squadron Leader, my commanding officer at No. 1 (F) squadron. (And a darn good pilot and boss.)

"Sunday June 6th

Another poor weather day, this time over the Blands and only one operational sortie flown, another sortie looking for the land-launched Exocet which hit Glamorgan as she left the gun line a couple of days earlier. In fact the launcher is mobile but we attack known positions on Stanley Common at the same time as doing a photo-recce”.

This sortie was flown using No. 1(F) squadron harriers from HMS Hermes and was led by Sdn Ldr Squire. He was accompanied by Flt Lt. Mike Beech from No.3(F) squadron, RAF, who had arrived from Ascension Island on the 1st June.

Just wanted to clarify the Exocet issue, and ensure that the 12 sailors who lost their lives on HMS Glamorgan are not forgotten.

I also want to indicate that this was no small incident for those of us in the British armed forces at the time, and that although an insignificant affair to most foreigners, many brave servicemen on both sides gave their ultimate sacrifice for their country.

Thank you,

"Needle"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 23, 2005 11:22 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Thanks, Nick and Rob. I was thinking it might have been the SAC bird but just couldn't remember.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 9:05 pm
Posts: 258
Location: Plano, TX
Just a quick correction to my previous post, before my RAF pension goes out the window. :(

I inadvertantly gave my CO the rank of Squadron Leader.
He was actually a Wing Commander. Sorry Sir. :wink:

"Needle"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:38 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
"Needle" - many thanks for reminding us of the land-launched exocet attack against HMS Glamorgan, it had, sadly, slipped my mind. When I referred to the Exocet, I was thinking of the five air-launched examples the Aregentinean's had. The attack on HMS Glamorgan was a very grim affair indeed. To be honest I am amazed that more ships were not lost during the conflict... it really was a very close run thing when you think back on it! Many thanks for joining the conversation, and I hope that you continue to contribute. No. 1 Squadron played a very important part in the Falklands campaign. Were you there at the time, or did you serve later?

Rob, many thanks for the synopsis on air-losses. Not to be pedantic, but the FAH is more commonly associated with the Honduran Air Force. I am unaware of an Argentinean air arm designated as the FAH. Ironically, the Argentinean Air Force was also referred to as the FAA (Fuerza Aerea Argentina), just like the Royal Navy's Fleet Air Arm. I also remember reading that several Argentinean aircraft were lost due to running out of fuel on the return leg, and didn't see them mentioned. Does anyone know the details about these losses?

Cheers,
Richard


Last edited by RMAllnutt on Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:45 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Hi Rob... that's interesting. I can find no reference to the FAH with respect to Argentina. Could you tell me where you found this reference, as I am very curious?

Cheers,
Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:54 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Also missing from the list of aircraft losses is the Sea King which was swallowed by a wave in very bad weather. I forget the date, but there were about 21 killed if I remember correctly, mostly from an SAS unit returning from a mission. There was only one survivor, and one part of his story has stayed riveted in my mind. After the helicopter crashed and was well below the surface he managed to make his way through a hatch. Just as he thought he was about to get out, he was caught around the leg by some heavy strapping... he struggled but couldn't get out. He then felt someone grab his leg, and the unmistakeable feeling of someone cutting his leg free with their knife. He then bobbed to the surface, but his rescuer never did. I cannot imagine a more unselfish act of bravery. It still gives me chills thinking of it!

Richard


Last edited by RMAllnutt on Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:56 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 12:58 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
Cheers Rob, it's always good to hear from you... I guess that it was just a typo on their part, it's easily done. I am still trying to wrack my brains to figure out what the H stood for, if indeed there was an argentinean unit named FAH.



Richard


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 8:34 am
Posts: 519
Location: Oxfordshire UK
Quote:
May 4 FAA Sea Harriers shot down by SAM


A small correction it was a single Sea Harrier on May 4th. Killing the Pilot.

However on May 6th two Sea Harriers were lost in bad weather (presumably by collision) Both pilots were lost

Richard, with regards to the Sea King, both Pilots got out but no-one down the back did, they were not all SAS men They had a member of the Royal Signals and the only RAF man killed in the War with them as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 2:34 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4700
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
RMAllnutt wrote:
I forget the date, but there were about 21 killed if I remember correctly, mostly from an SAS unit returning from a mission.

Richard


Being that they were SAS...are their names public knowledge?

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 4:59 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
For a photo of the trailer-mounted Exocet, follow this link, and scroll down the page once there:

http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jel/jfq_pubs/jfq1605.pdf


Some of the most commonly used terms:


FAA = Fuerza Aerea Argentina

COAN = Comando de la Aviacion Naval (it is not
"CANA" as has been used by some english language publications and websites)

PNA = Prefectura Naval Argentina (Coast Guard)

IGN = Instituto Geografico Nacional.
IGM = Instituto Geografico Militar.

The Learjet shot down, was IIRC, from the IGN.

Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 9:53 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
I've just done a little research and found out that MotF, myself, and Rob were all a little mistaken about the helicopter crash with the SAS patrol on board.

It happened on 19th May, and was most likely due to bird ingestion. It was a Sea King, not a Wessex. 22 men lost their lives, 18 of them SAS, 1 RAF, 1 Royal Signals, 1 ?, so my memory was pretty good there. However, there were nine survivors (which I am very glad to hear, considering I had only remembered one, and MotF two). The details are at this site... (scroll down to "Sea King crash".)

http://www.britains-smallwars.com/Falklands/sas.htm

Cheers, R.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Falklands War
PostPosted: Thu Nov 24, 2005 3:49 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:10 pm
Posts: 280
Location: CT
RMAllnut/Needle:

Tks for the latest data/inputs. Looking for the following data:

1. Pictures or the Argie Sub "Santa Fe" that end up on a beach due to poss mechanical problems.

2. There is a story of UK Special Ops folks who were trying to infiltrate by helicopter via Chile the back door of S. Argentina. One of them crashed. Was this helicopter ever recovered? tks

_________________
FAH619®


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hooligan2 and 348 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group