Warbird Kid wrote:
Steve Nelson wrote:
There are some wrecks and pieces here and there, but there doesn't seem to be much interest compared to the B-17. There are several Fortress restorations going on that started with next to nothing, but nobody seems to be interested putting the effort and money into doing the same with a Liberator.
And THAT ladies and gentleman... is the problem unfortunately. We have B-17 airframes being built from almost nothing. Wouldn't it be grand if some group decided to build a 24 like this? If it's already being done with the B-17, it can be done for the B-24. Its just a matter of interest and money. Sadly the 24 (Like the B-26) has never been as popular as the B-17 or B-25. Even though more were used in all theaters.
Like the gentleman down in Tennessee? who is building up enough parts and components for 5 to 7 B-17s? (Anyone have that info?) I hope a crazed B-24 fanatic will follow suit and do the same.
The B-17 airframe formers are round in shape, and can be made with low-cost machinery and little effort. The wing is simply made of plate metal and extrusions.
The Liberator airframe design is primarily of aluminum stampings. This is the main reason why existing B-24 restorations are difficult to impossible. To make a static B-24 fly may require complete center wing section disassembly, to replace the rivets and to inspect the wing bulkheads and spars. To complicate matters worse, the wing bulkheads were I believe progressive stampings near the wing root.