Warbird Information Exchange

i've , seen many pre -war pics of wildcats, vindicators, avengers dauntllesses etc, etc, with deployable inflating ditching bags on impact w/ the water. a novel approach for crew survival, & aircraft recovery. why wasn't this implemented during the war?? it could have saved countless lives, not to mention salvageable aircraft.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!

Hi Tom,

The floatation devices were too heavy - the weight was more effectively used for armor to keep the aircraft from getting shot down in the first place. (The same thing happened with most of the auto-deployable lift rafts.) Also, in most combat losses, it seemed wiser to get out of the aircraft at altitude than to ride it down.

The decisions seem to have come down through 1941 and 1942 - I haven't found a single document that served as the milepost, "from this date forward..."

Cheers,



Dana

I recall reading once that operational paranoia played a part as well. The idea that an aircraft with floatation bags could get away and be recovered by the enemy.

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.

that makes sense, a valid point.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!