Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Texas National Guard?
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 10:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
I have a question. Did the Tx National Guard land F102's on a carrier?

Thanks for looking.


I think i have the answer. They never landed a F-102 on a carrier.

_________________
Well if I can't rollerskate around my playpen while smoking and drinking a beer, I'm staying home..


Last edited by Versatile on Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:05 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3260
Location: Phoenix, Az
Yes, they did it all the time on the carrier RTN Almo based on Lake Worth.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:17 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1161
Versatile wrote:
I have a question. Did the Tx National Guard land F102's on a carrier?

Thanks for looking.


If this is a serious question, no the F-102 nor the TF-102 was never capable of operating on an aircraft carrier. Never done. Not intended or designed to operate from an aircraft carrier. No catapult hook up points, no arresting hook (the barrier hook is no way intended for carrier arrestment) not stressed for it, and the delta wing is a poor choice for carrier aircraft. Any F-102 on a carrier today is strictly a museum piece hoisted aboard.

I do know of a ex-Texas national guard F-102 pilot, that later landed on a carrier, but that was in and S-3 Viking with the call sign of Navy-One.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 11:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5253
Location: Eastern Washington
Silly question.
-The F-102 was never carrier capable...not designed to be, no one ever thought it should be. Designed as an Air Force interceptor. The Navy had its own delta, the Douglas Skyray as a carrier-based interceptor.
-I'd wager the approach and landing speeds would prohibit it. Growing up on a F-102 base, I saw their long landing runs.
-Why would the "Texas National Guard" land on a carrier? Have you ever heard of any Air Force or National Guard fixed-wing unit fly from carriers?
-Finally, it's AIR National Guard.

If this question is prompted by one a carrier museum, I'd suggest that that's one of the things wrong with the carrier museum concept.
How many school kids who don't know a SPAD from a Phantom go home thinking the SR-71 (among other unlikely aircraft) flew off ships?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:39 pm 
Versatile wrote:
I have a question. Did the Tx National Guard land F102's on a carrier?

Thanks for looking.


I think i have the answer. They never landed a F-102 on a carrier.


That seems like an awful odd question and of course you already had the answer. And just on a purist note The Texas AIR National Guard flew F-102's. Usually when the generic term National Guard is used it is more likely to refer to the Army National Guard, while when referring to aircraft assigned to the Air Force component of the National Guard the term Air National Guard is used.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 05, 2014 2:41 pm 
JohnB wrote:
Silly question.

-Why would the "Texas National Guard" land on a carrier? Have you ever heard of any Air Force or National Guard fixed-wing unit fly from carriers?
-Finally, it's AIR National Guard.



Thanks John! :)


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
sandiego89 wrote:
Versatile wrote:
I have a question. Did the Tx National Guard land F102's on a carrier?

Thanks for looking.


If this is a serious question, no the F-102 nor the TF-102 was never capable of operating on an aircraft carrier. Never done. Not intended or designed to operate from an aircraft carrier. No catapult hook up points, no arresting hook (the barrier hook is no way intended for carrier arrestment) not stressed for it, and the delta wing is a poor choice for carrier aircraft. Any F-102 on a carrier today is strictly a museum piece hoisted aboard.

I do know of a ex-Texas national guard F-102 pilot, that later landed on a carrier, but that was in and S-3 Viking with the call sign of Navy-One.


Yes this was a serious question. I am no expert on jets at all. A man was spouting off and due to his ranking as to where i was at i didn't want to call him on it. I was sure that the 102 was never flown by the navy and thought it was never sat up or designed to. Rather that call him on it in front of a group of people i thought it wiser to ask here at WIX than call him on it and for some strange reason find out i was wrong.

Call it a stupid question if you want. I just thought i could ask the experts without an attack.
Thank you

_________________
Well if I can't rollerskate around my playpen while smoking and drinking a beer, I'm staying home..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 11:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2012 6:59 pm
Posts: 70
The Navy had a few Sea Darts that were designed to take off from the water not a carrier, but they were just for testing. One of them is displayed in Lakeland outside the EAA museum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:28 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4961
Location: PA
Versatile wrote:
sandiego89 wrote:
Versatile wrote:
I just thought i could ask the experts without an attack.
Thank you


You used to. Just not anymore. LOL :?

:drink3:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1161
Versatile wrote:
sandiego89 wrote:
Versatile wrote:
I have a question. Did the Tx National Guard land F102's on a carrier?

Thanks for looking.


If this is a serious question, no the F-102 nor the TF-102 was never capable of operating on an aircraft carrier. Never done. Not intended or designed to operate from an aircraft carrier. No catapult hook up points, no arresting hook (the barrier hook is no way intended for carrier arrestment) not stressed for it, and the delta wing is a poor choice for carrier aircraft. Any F-102 on a carrier today is strictly a museum piece hoisted aboard.

I do know of a ex-Texas national guard F-102 pilot, that later landed on a carrier, but that was in and S-3 Viking with the call sign of Navy-One.


Yes this was a serious question. I am no expert on jets at all. A man was spouting off and due to his ranking as to where i was at i didn't want to call him on it. I was sure that the 102 was never flown by the navy and thought it was never sat up or designed to. Rather that call him on it in front of a group of people i thought it wiser to ask here at WIX than call him on it and for some strange reason find out i was wrong.

Call it a stupid question if you want. I just thought i could ask the experts without an attack.
Thank you


Sorry if my "serious?" part came across as an attack- I didn't call it stupid or silly, I just thought it might be a George Bush, Texas Air Guard type wind up. I too have heard some dubious claims by certain folks at museums and the like, and yes sometimes it is best to not embarras someone.

I too prefer only carrier based aircraft at carrier museums. I agree the Intrepid must throw a lot of people off.

Sorry again Versatile.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
Thanks.

_________________
Well if I can't rollerskate around my playpen while smoking and drinking a beer, I'm staying home..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:18 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5253
Location: Eastern Washington
Don't take my comment personally...given the level of discussion here, it is a unexpected question.
And given it had so many issues (NG...not ANG...on carrier?) ...besides the simple question on whether a specific type is carrier capable, it came across as more of a joke.

Even a bright guy can ask something silly...I do it all the time. Ask my car mechanic friends.

There is no such thing as stupid question, but someone with 500+ posts here asking such a question does come across as, well silly.*

Sorry if my word choice offended you.

*My favorite WIX story is a few years back someone asked "What does the B in B-17 mean?"
My first thought was "That's sweet some 9 year old who is new to aviation history is asking the question".
I recalled asking my dad, a wartime B-17 pilot, when I was 8 or 9 what was the difference between the B-24 and B-25 since they looked similar in some of the airplane books I got from the library. His reply "The B-24 has 4 engines, the B-25 has two". That brief interaction remains in my mind one of my favorite father-son moments in my childhood.

Then I looked at the guy's profile...he had 500+ posts and had been a member for years. Again it was a unexpected question from a guy who had been posting here for a long time and one would think he'd know the basics.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 7:51 am
Posts: 68
Not everyone knows everything ...............what might seem a silly question to one might well be a serious question to another .


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 11:59 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 1:35 pm
Posts: 636
You just never know with a AC so many different models. I am not into the Warbird scene as much as before and jets were never much on my radar.
Doesn't bother me one bit that i was abused over this. Life goes on. Good way to run people off is to come at them when they have a question. Bad for the forum overall. Maybe we just need a NO FLAME section for off the wall questions.

_________________
Well if I can't rollerskate around my playpen while smoking and drinking a beer, I'm staying home..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5253
Location: Eastern Washington
If you think calling a question (that a quick look on wiki would answer)...not you...silly...I'd suggest you might be a tad to sensitive for any forum. :)

And thanks for graciously accepting my apology.... :roll:

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Last edited by JohnB on Tue Sep 09, 2014 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 107 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group