aerocapture wrote:
Mr. Mark Allen M,
If you would like to fully cover any and all costs to repaint the Madras Maiden in accurate markings that are based on a red color scheme, we would entertain your offer.
The replacement of the Madras Maiden nose art is not an option though.
- Lyle
I lied, one more last, last post. I'd usually let something like this go, but you did counter my offer with an offer of your own. I guess I should try to honor it. Not sure how we could agree to the artwork issue though, seems like your dead set on that one. Perhaps if you did agree to a scheme change we could change the artwork down the road? Another option would be to put the "Shirley Jean" artwork on one side and keep your "Madras Maiden" artwork on the other?. I believe your artist only painted it on one side? Just some thoughts. No negative feelings Lyle and nothing against the girl or artist. Photo source Fold3 archives
This Particular B-17 would be a fantastic idea because (1) it's got the 'red color scheme' and (2) it has some real nice Oregon connections. I'll let a few others fill in the History if they wish.
B-17G "Shirley Jean" 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG. During 18 months at Bassingbourn flew at least 98 missions, last being 4 March 1945 to Reutlingen.
Lt. J.R. Lindahl And Crew Of The 324Th Bomb Sq., 91St Bomb Group, 8Th Air Force, Beside The Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress 'Shirley Jean'. England.
B-17G Shirley Jean 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG. During 18 months at Bassingbourn flew at least 98 missions, last being 4 March 1945 to Reutlingen
B-17G 42-107040 Shirley Jean (coded OR-K) of the 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG (OR for Oregon?
wouldn't that be a nice touch)
B-17G 42-107040 Shirley Jean (coded OR-K) of the 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG
B-17G 42-107040 Shirley Jean (coded OR-K) of the 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG
B-17G 42-107040 Shirley Jean (coded OR-K) of the 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG
Damage to B-17G 42-107040 "Shirley Jean" of the 323rd Bomb Sq, 91st BG. The aircraft was involved in a midair collision
SSGT Michael Fanchek, tail gunner, inspects the damage to B-17G 44-6151 "Shure Shot" of the 324th Bomb Sq, 91st BG, resulting from a midair collision
BTW Lyle, I guess it should be stated that in no way would I or many of the other WIX members feel the need to chastize the owner, yourself or your crew. This was NEVER the intention. I suppose you could look at it this way. Granted we don't own these airplanes, but many of us sincerely care about them (and their owners) and the veterans who flew them during the war. As has been stated time and again, these wonderful fellows are leaving us faster than we can make the effort to thank them properly. We could simply not care and never express our opinions at all, but I'd really like to think that owners do care what many of us think. I'll admit I've gone a bit too far, but I sincerely hope you can respect where I stand, just as much as I respect the owners decisions as best I can. A few careless comments in a few of my posts may not reflect that but they all were well meaning I assure you.
NONE of us are looking for pats on the back or to be viewed as crusaders for justice against the owners of warbirds. Nothing like that at all.
Who knows perhaps I'm just a freak of nature because I give a sh*t ...
Sorry for the massive and sometimes convoluted thread, didn't think it would go this far, and as often happens with threads that carry on and on (of which I'm to blame) it can get a bit screwy.