Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 3:46 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 59
DaveM2 wrote:
Milmart, I don't think Syria can be considered Eastern Bloc, and we are talking the 1970s for Kellys Heroes, not early post war.

Hey they are all part of the evil empire when they are shooting at you :D

Quote:
The Soviets soon got rid of any 'Western' equipment from their sphere of influence, whether it be aircraft or armour, as soon as possible.

Again your thinking too broadly. Speak to any militaria dealer after the fall of the wall in 1989 and they will tell you the Russians did not discard anything, and there are still thousands of WLA's coming out of the woodwork in Russia today from lease lend.

Image

The Russians also copied and used
GPA Amphib Jeep
Image

DUKW (BAV 485)
Image

Studebaker
Image

The Communists were able to equip the North Koreans with Grease Guns and 1928 / M1A1 Thompsons and the NVA and VC with MG34's, 98k's and MP40's
Image

War stocks of Allied lease lend and captured weapons which are STILL coming out of the FSU
http://www.zib-militaria.de/epages/6143 ... ucts/10014

Quote:
None of those countries operated Tigers either.

They didn't operate Tigers due to the fact they had their own Heavy Tank in the JS series, light years ahead of Allied design in 1945. What better way to show they were superior to the west, however the Panther was a better IMO medium tank from the wartime period and don't forget there were a LOT around.

Plus the Czechs made their own version of the sdkfz 250 Neu and sdfkz 251 semi tracks (the OT810 that re-enactors and your own Peter Jackson love to convert to WW2 spec)
Image

Communist countries did operate WW2 German armour however - the fact they filmed KH in Yugoslavia in 1970 was due to the large amount of US armour and equipment there

_________________
We assist private collectors and museums to enhance their collections in the pursuit of the conservation and preservation of military history.
http://www.milmart_militaria.net

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 6:55 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 2:43 am
Posts: 2476
Location: New Zealand
Milmart

Interesting thanks. Yes I am aware trucks, small arms etc were still in use until the 70s-8s ( and remarkably the machine guns etc still today. When I was in Austria in the late 1980s a buddy showed me some MG-34/42s the Austrians still used for training), however I should have made it clearer that I am talking about main battle weapons - tanks and aircraft.

I think the Russians will disagree that the Panther is a better tank than the T-34. :wink: Certainly better technically, but not in a reliability sense.
I think one of the reasons Tigers were not used post war is that they were relatively scarce, even at peak production they were only generally available to the elite SS and Wehrmacht Divisions. Being scarce also meant parts were even harder to find.

Anyway, back to aircraft, I think it was a 1950s flypast of Mosquitos over Prague at which a high ranking Soviet delegation attended which saw the Soviet authorities order them destroyed. They were not amused that the Czech AF were flying British aircraft and had them replaced with Soviet types. Strangely inconsistent however, as they were still able to operate the Czech built 109s (Avias) up until 1952.

Interesting thread - perhaps mods want to shift to the off topic section?

_________________
Classic Wings Magazine

https://www.classicwings.com/

Facebook

https://www.facebook.com/ClassicWingsMagazine/

Preserved Axis Aircraft

http://www.classicwings.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:05 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
Indeed interesting and here I was simply posting a 'heads up' on an upcoming war movie with what looks to be warbirds included. Strange how things twist and turn on this crazy train lol. Military matters would seem the appropriate place IMO

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 59
yeah sorry about that chief when it comes to WW2 hardware I'm one of these... geek

Its just not that long ago we didn't think any of these survived until someone went to Kubinka - and even then we didn't know there was a place like kubinka !
Image

Apologies for the thread highjack

_________________
We assist private collectors and museums to enhance their collections in the pursuit of the conservation and preservation of military history.
http://www.milmart_militaria.net

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 9:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
Not to worry, sometimes this place suffers from too many chiefs and not enough Indians. BTW who are 'we' .... Your website doesn't seem to want to open (for me)

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 59
New (well to me) Trailer for "Fury"

Fury Official Trailer #1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKu5lGfRBxc

Fury Official Preview Featurette
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wj2ASJwfk4

_________________
We assist private collectors and museums to enhance their collections in the pursuit of the conservation and preservation of military history.
http://www.milmart_militaria.net

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
in the trailer / preview....... fyi, 1 of the tankers is wearing ww2 / korea / cold war goggles w/ the soviet aluminum rectangular shape. i sold a pair to doug champlin years ago when they were unattainable before the collapse of the ussr. both pilots & tankmen wore them. i wonder how those goggles factor in to the movie. those goggles are not so rare anymore.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 7:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:21 pm
Posts: 124
Location: United Kingdom
I am fanatical about the accuracy of 'period' equipment in films. Apparently the production company was pretty obsessed too - they used Axis Track Services, which is the business name of the guys from the popular TV show 'combat dealers' here in the UK - they specialise in restoring and selling authentic WWII vehicles. I met the boss Bruce Compton at this year's 'War & Peace' show and he's a very knowledgable guy. In the TV show, you can see them doing all the research, using the expertise of well known historians such as Hilary Doyle, to make sure they get the details right. Fascinating stuff.

Anyway, I'm hoping all that realistic stuff will make the film a winner


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 9:30 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5120
Location: Stratford, CT.
This movie sure looks like its on the path to popularity and high accolades. Cant wait to see this. Any real aircraft used in the filming?

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 12:10 am
Posts: 59
tom d. friedman wrote:
in the trailer / preview....... fyi, 1 of the tankers is wearing ww2 / korea / cold war goggles w/ the soviet aluminum rectangular shape. i sold a pair to doug champlin years ago when they were unattainable before the collapse of the ussr. both pilots & tankmen wore them. i wonder how those goggles factor in to the movie. those goggles are not so rare anymore.

I don't think there is any back story as such, I had a close friend who was an US and WSS extra onset and he said variations with all the "costume" happened almost on a daily basis. Things being added and subtracted on a whim of an art department head or webbing supervisor. Not dissing the film just recounting what I was told.

I think the M2HB behind Brad's shoulder is missing a fairly major component too :shock:
Image

_________________
We assist private collectors and museums to enhance their collections in the pursuit of the conservation and preservation of military history.
http://www.milmart_militaria.net

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 7:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
Saw it tonight, its a great movie. Extremely well filmed and really worth seeing. One of the best WW2 films I've seen in a very long time.

JH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2014 11:31 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7560
Unfortunately for me I've seen too many airplane, tank, ship and equipment photos. I'm jaded. Just saw this movie. Entertaining? Yes. Authentic looking stuff? Yes. Plot? Typical Hollywood. Realistic? Other than the equipment, uniforms etc. No. Any scene that showed airplanes was the typical CGI overkill. IMO CGI is great for sci-fi and animation and the people who create stuff with CGI still have a long way to go as far as understanding airplanes. Go see it to spend money and be entertained as Hollywood would want It. Just leave your attention to reality at home.

For this movie I'll give it a 7 out of 10 as it was at least entertaining. Band of Brothers is still hard to beat IMHO

_________________
[Thread title is ridiculous btw]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 538
Location: Auckland, NZ
Sounds promising, and probably worth a rare trip to the movie theatre.

The publicity about 'Fury' reminded me that I never got around to editing most of my photos from Classic Fighters 2013 Airshow in NZ. The ground entertainment included a Weta Workshop Tiger I replica, as well as a fair number of re-enactors. And for aviation content, a Natter!

Flickr set of static: https://www.flickr.com/photos/errolgc/s ... 356036168/

ImageOmaka13_1124flr by errolgc, on Flickr

ImageOmaka13_5312flr by errolgc, on Flickr

ImageOmaka13_4071flr by errolgc, on Flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 7:39 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5253
Location: Eastern Washington
I'm an aviation guy and know very little of WWII vehicles (a guy only has so much time for interests :) ).
But its good to see any film remind younger people of the wartime service of my father's generation.

Also, I noticed from the results of the recent armored vehicle collection sale, that Sherman's are now bringing $400,000.
Who knew?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2014 9:11 am 
Offline
Newly minted Mustang Pilot
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 1413
Location: Everywhere
Saw it yesterday...it is a great popcorn movie...1000 times better than red tails and Memphis Belle...but that said they had the potential to tell a great true story, instead we get a Hollywood story. The character from Georgia was completely unnecessary IMHO. I'm no critic but it could have been better. From an accuracy point of view...looked perfect.

Jim

_________________
www.spiritof44.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 58 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CAPFlyer, Cubs2jets, DH82EH, Google Adsense [Bot] and 122 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group