Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 12:23 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:09 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
Probably not! :axe: :lol:
But the Imperial War Museum has started work on a historically significant display of a Zeke brought off Taroa Island.
It has to be historically significant because the USN set off some sort of explosive next to the right side of it while it ws luxuriating in the Pacific and so it is now history!
Image
Image
Image

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:14 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
Our story continues...
The aircraft appears to have been shot up and then after it returned to base it was cannabalized for parts... and then it was turned into a decoy and the Navy obligingly either bombed or shelled it and deformed those panels on the right side.
Then in order to remove it for further safe-keeping the wings were surgically removed.
Image
Image
IWM has the wings, but they are not pretty. Also some galvanic corrosion has set in on the wing tops.
Image
Image

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Last edited by SPANNERmkV on Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 7:24 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
And now the real reason for this thread---
For all the A&Ps, modellers :lol: and fans of Mitsubishi who wondered how these things were built- a few detail shots...
Looking forward from the right side of the huge gaping hole
Image

Looking forward from the left side of said huge gaping hole- note the plexi-glass stringers around the circumference holding the fuselage together.
Image
Access hole for the tailwheel and empennage servicing.
Image
Image
Tail-wheel
Image
Looking aft towards the tail-cone
Image
Image
Image
Note: the lovely Plexi-glass bulkhead reinforcements which Andy used to strengthen the airframe so he could run plexi-glass stringers to tie the fuselage into the empennage to keep it from folding in on itself.
Image

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Last edited by SPANNERmkV on Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:27 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 11:37 pm
Posts: 419
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanks for posting. Those pictures will come in handy. Especially like the tail wheel shot.

_________________
Better is the enemy of Good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Chesapeake Va
Thanks for posting. great pictures and its always good to hear another Japanese plane being restored, sense there are so few. but i would love to here more about the HE 111 in the back ground. thanks again

Travis

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74595482@N04/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
The bottom picture shows the stringers to good effect.
It was explained to me (and forgive me if I get this wrong) that the stringers were left open, probably to save weight, but that it also contributed to the inability of the Airframe to withstand high-speed dives without structural tail flutter and/or failure.

I think the implication was IF GRUMMAN HAD MADE IT- it would have had top hats for stringers and they would have it flying again for Flying Legends 2013! :supz:

But seriously- the Museum plans to preserve what is there, possibly add some missing bits if available and correct AND place it in a diorama style display.

Should anyone need any specific detail shots I imagine we can cajole one of the locals to snap off specific requests!

If anyone has any asundry correct bits that might add to this project let's talk via PMs...

SPANNER the helpful

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Last edited by SPANNERmkV on Tue Jul 10, 2012 3:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 2:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
Travisd80elcam wrote:
Thanks for posting. great pictures and its always good to hear another Japanese plane being restored, sense there are so few. but i would love to here more about the HE 111 in the back ground. thanks again

Travis


Travis,
I believe we are looking at a Spanish CASA and that it is for sale by sealed bid.
I know the IWM has a CASA built Ju-52 available and a French built Storch as well... Also for sale by sealed bid.
Image
Serious inquiries only please. We do not need to distract the IWM with tyre-kicking "Looky-Lous" :lol:

Jump in and correct me if I am wrong Pedro Verde.

SPANNER the easily confused and still terribly jet-lagged

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 2:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Chesapeake Va
Thank you for the quick response. Now how do we get some one in VA to buy it :). thanks again

Travis

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74595482@N04/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:28 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
There's nothing like a Spanner tour! Thanks.

Interestingly, it looks about the same as I recall when I last looked at it in 2004, but I gather from your comments and presumed conversation with 'Andy', it's getting some work now and that's a rather good Conservator on the job (IMHO.)
SPANNERmkV wrote:
The bottom picture shows the stringers to good effect.
It was explained to me (and forgive me if I get this wrong) that the stringers were left open, probably to save weight, but that it also contributed to the inability of the Airframe to withstand high-speed dives without structural tail flutter and/or failure.

Interesting - I've never read of empennage failures of the Zero - a quick check shows wing failures were an issue, but not the back end. We might be concatenating that it was famously unable to sustain any significant combat damage, and fuselage damage may have regularly led to the tail surfaces detaching. More from the better versed welcome...

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:57 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3185
Location: New York
The CAF Zero looked a lot like this when I first saw it in Dave Price's shop back in the 80s. A docent gave me a very interesting tour of the structure that I still remember, including showing me a lot of structural parts that would have been castings on a US aircraft but that on the Zero were sheet metal bent into intricate cross sections. Lightness, cheapness and ease of manufacture were all cited as reasons. I came away with the sense that the Zero is still an under-appreciated aeroplane, at least in the west.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:01 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 3:07 pm
Posts: 620
Location: S. Texas
SPANNERmkV wrote:
The bottom picture shows the stringers to good effect.
It was explained to me (and forgive me if I get this wrong) that the stringers were left open, probably to save weight, but that it also contributed to the inability of the Airframe to withstand high-speed dives without structural tail flutter and/or failure.

I think the implication was IF GRUMMAN HAD MADE IT- it would have had top hats for stringers and they would have it flying again for Flying Legends 2013! :supz:

But seriously- the Museum plans to preserve what is there, possibly add some missing bits if available and correct AND place it in a diorama style display.

Should anyone need any specific detail shots I imagine we can cajole one of the locals to snap off specific requests!

If anyone has any asundry correct bits that might add to this project let's talk via PMs...

SPANNER the helpful


Actually those stringers look like any normal "Z" stringer I have seen. Lot's of those type of stringers in the FM-2.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:06 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 12:34 pm
Posts: 1275
Location: Houston, TX
JDK wrote:
There's nothing like a Spanner tour! Thanks.

Interesting - I've never read of empennage failures of the Zero - a quick check shows wing failures were an issue, but not the back end. We might be concatenating that it was famously unable to sustain any significant combat damage, and fuselage damage may have regularly led to the tail surfaces detaching. More from the better versed welcome...

Regards,


Much obliged JDK---

I stand guilty of all concatenization that may have occured in my extemporizing about fluttering Zeke tail-feathers.
I re-read the Corky Meyers Flight Journal article and all he noted in a high speed dive was a distinct concretization of the ailerons and the elevators, but strangely enough, NOT so much with the rudder.

I wonder if in a few more years we are going to see dioramas of shot down Wildcats or P40s in the land of the rising sun? hmmmm pop1

SPANNER the correctable

_________________
Support Your Local Warbirds! KBO!
The only reasons the airplanes matter is what the veterans did with them... and why.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 2:29 am
Posts: 245
Location: Paradise
Spitfires had z section stringers as well but werent full length..

_________________
Those who think it,s impossible should leave the ones doing it alone..
http://www.spitfireprojecta58-27.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:57 pm
Posts: 1234
Location: Lacombe, Alberta, Canada
About ten years ago I got a tour of Blayd's shop and their pile of original Zero stuff that they had reverse engineered. I was impressed with the Zero's construction but it certainly looked pretty labour intensive. Blayd's operation was very impressive (and really great people) and they had enough new stuff stashed away to produce another two or three airplanes someday.

Dan

_________________
Defending Stearmans on WIX since Jeff started badmouthing them back in 2005.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group