Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 10:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9715
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Kevin,
You bring up some good points. :drink3:

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5228
Location: Eastern Washington
While i aggee the aircraft should be well looked after and (in most cases) undercover, I'm against the wholesale stripping of WWII away from USAF bases.

The units at the bases have a right to have their heritage on display. I'm afraid the "warbird" communuity is so wrapped up in flying and making sure planes have the correct color codes, that some forget that.

Take the Dyess B-17. It's so stripped and has been outside for so long (long before it was moved and given to the base) that it's never going to fly again.
With that reality, I rather like the idea of B-1 crews driving past it every day on their way to work. It's doing just as good there as it would be at a civil muesum where it would be seen by 95% of the visitors (non-aviation or history buffs and all the school kids there on fieldtrips who are more interested in horsing around than learning anything) as nothing more than a giant Revell kit.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 23, 2012 12:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9715
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I also see John's point in that it is important for the bases to have the planes for current military. One of my favorite stories was told here. At an airshow a B-1 crew was standing together talking to folks. An older gentleman in his late 80's and wearing his A-2 with artwork on it walked up to the plane. As they showed him around he told them he had flown the B-17 in WWII. His family waited for him by the nose, and as he left the plane and said goodbye, the B-1 crew stood, and saluted him.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 3:15 pm
Posts: 951
mustangdriver wrote:
I also see John's point in that it is important for the bases to have the planes for current military. One of my favorite stories was told here. At an airshow a B-1 crew was standing together talking to folks. An older gentleman in his late 80's and wearing his A-2 with artwork on it walked up to the plane. As they showed him around he told them he had flown the B-17 in WWII. His family waited for him by the nose, and as he left the plane and said goodbye, the B-1 crew stood, and saluted him.



Magnificent !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 459
Not to add another level to the process, but if the gov't were willing to divest or shift assets, is there any board or authority that would / could serve as a liason between the gov't and a body of museums that would be able to make "the best fit"? A warbird lobbiest or someone familiar with what musuem could support moving a certain airframe into in a structured organized way.

Because this thread started with Barksdale, I'll use them....what if they were to lose thier aircraft, what agency would hear what a specific museum has to say as to why they are deserving. Would the Air Force just use expediency to move them, or would they be able to go to somebody, or even a request list, to determine what would be a good fit?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 10:08 pm
Posts: 1173
Location: Tulsa, OK
seabee,

Right now, if an aircraft that is part of the NMUSAF's loan program fails in its maintenance or is no longer wanted by an organization, it is reclaimed by NMUSAF and reassigned. Sometimes that means back to NMUSAF to replace/supplement something in their present collection. Other times, it goes to a waiting museum/organization. From what I understand, there is a waiting list that NMUSAF maintains for various types. The list is long for B-17s, B-24s etc. The biggest catch is that the organization taking on the aircraft as a new loan is responsible for the cost of disassembly, transport, and reassembly. They already have that system in place.

What I have proposed is that the NMUSAF do an inventory of its sprawling collection, and then auction off the spare airframes to non-profits and museums to raise capital for the restoration of the museum's core collection, and to put the spares in the hands of organizations that can and will raise money to restore those aircraft as well. I'm not suggesting auctioning off the Memphis Belle or anything, but the extra 5 or so B-17s that the NMUSAF still owns but just has scattered around the country on outdoor display. In my opinion, the time has come for the outdoor display of WWII era bombers and fighters to end.

This would be just one way to accomplish that goal in a way that, I believe, would greatly benefit the NMUSAF.

kevin

_________________
FOUND the elusive DT-built B-24! Woo-hoo!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 23, 2012 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 1:52 pm
Posts: 171
Location: Chesapeake Va
tulsaboy wrote:
seabee,

Right now, if an aircraft that is part of the NMUSAF's loan program fails in its maintenance or is no longer wanted by an organization, it is reclaimed by NMUSAF and reassigned. Sometimes that means back to NMUSAF to replace/supplement something in their present collection. Other times, it goes to a waiting museum/organization. From what I understand, there is a waiting list that NMUSAF maintains for various types. The list is long for B-17s, B-24s etc. The biggest catch is that the organization taking on the aircraft as a new loan is responsible for the cost of disassembly, transport, and reassembly. They already have that system in place.

What I have proposed is that the NMUSAF do an inventory of its sprawling collection, and then auction off the spare airframes to non-profits and museums to raise capital for the restoration of the museum's core collection, and to put the spares in the hands of organizations that can and will raise money to restore those aircraft as well. I'm not suggesting auctioning off the Memphis Belle or anything, but the extra 5 or so B-17s that the NMUSAF still owns but just has scattered around the country on outdoor display. In my opinion, the time has come for the outdoor display of WWII era bombers and fighters to end.

This would be just one way to accomplish that goal in a way that, I believe, would greatly benefit the NMUSAF.

kevin



I couldn't agree more. I would love to see any WW2 aircraft be sold to help fund the work at NMUSAF, and at the same time it would be awesome for other groups to be able to help save these birds. Just my two cent. I am on board for that idea :drink3:
Travis

_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74595482@N04/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 24, 2012 7:37 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9715
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I too wish that they could all be displayed indoors, but selling them off is not going to solve that. As I have said before, most museums are just not able to undertake something like a B-17 or a B-29 that don't already have one. There are a couple that could, but not enough to totally solve the problem. I know that the NMUSAF plans on stream lining some of the collections that are outdoors starting this summer. This should be pretty common knowledge to anyone having stuff on loan. Everyone talks about the F-105. Let's say that they start selling F-105's and allow them to fly. Keep in mind there is an F-105 in private hands. How many groups can really do that. How many F-105's are really going to be saved. Maybe 3. Let's go high and say 5. That doesn't really fix the problem. Then how many F-105's would we lose that are currently on static display, but would end up becoming parts planes for the flyers. Not sure what the answer is, but the whole selling them off to fly is cool, but won't really fix the problem.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 19, 2012 1:44 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:10 am
Posts: 1536
Location: Shreveport, Louisiana
see the link...

http://arklatexhomepage.com/fulltext/?nxd_id=206407

_________________
Rob Mears
'Surviving Corsairs' Historian
robcmears@yahoo.com
http://www.robmears.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:22 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 11, 2009 5:28 am
Posts: 2008
Location: massachusetts
Has there been any updates on any of the barksdale aircraft?

_________________
" I am a nobody in aviation, but somebody to my family."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 10, 2013 11:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 4:43 pm
Posts: 153
I would love to see this done, hope something comes of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:08 pm 
Offline
Senior Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 12:22 am
Posts: 3874
Location: DFW Texas
Here's a pic of the nose....there is something in there...
http://www.airport-data.com/aircraft/ph ... 77915.html


Last fall I talked with the folks in charge of the airplanes at Barksdale during our A-10 unit visit. I told them that I was excited to read on their website that there was a plan to raise money and build buildings and/or overhead shelters for the aircraft, beginning with the old ones. The new director told me there was no longer such a plan and the guy that came up with the plan and put it on the website was no longer with the museum.

So...I don't hold out much hope for the airplanes to be covered or moved inside in the near future.

I did see a bunch of folks washing and painting one the B-52's...so some care is happening.

Image

Image

_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
Image http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadio
Listen at http://www.warbirdradio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group