T J Johansen wrote:
Django wrote:
Probably because it hasn't looked like that for a few years.
Yes I know, but the question still stand. Did those who b!tch about the CAF stickers today have the same very vocal opinion about this one back in 2005? Or is it easier to stick it to an organization rather than an individual owner?
T J
I will chime in here against my better judgement.
When I owned the B-25 it wore these markings for less than a year during the spring and summer of 2005. I bought the airplane in winter of 04/05. The paint scheme that was on it for all the years prior to my purchase was completely inaccurate. We put the large decals on it to raise awareness of the new magazine and also to help drive subscriptions. This was never anticipated to be a permanent fixture of the airplane. This directly led to us flying the airplane to Arizona after the 2005 airshow season where it was completely stripped and an accurate paint scheme was placed on it for the 2006 season. That cost over 30k. After the 2006 season the airplane had served its purpose, we had a lot of fun with it, and I decided the expense was no longer worth it the return.
Oh, and yes, we did hear the b!itching, but only from a select few. I explained to those that did the realities of the cost of owning and operating these aircraft, let alone repainting or stripping something the size of a B-25. The purchase price of this type of airplane is only a fraction of the resulting operating costs if you plan to fly it.. and fly it we did...over 200 hours in two years.
I love to see warbirds painted in accurate paint schemes, but given the choice of seeing it sit dormant in the hangar (like this B-25 did for years before I bought it) or our flying, I know which one I will choose....
My two cents!