Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun Jul 06, 2025 6:00 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
Found this on the Key Publishing forum, never heard of them before; the state of preservation looks amazing (small pic second page of thread), I might have to track down the Dec issue of Britain At War magazine to see more. From the magazine link it looks like they are "birdcage" models?:

http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=95565

With all due respect to the pilots still within these airframes.

cheers

greg v.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:03 pm 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
I've heard of these wrecks before, very cool to see some pictures. Stunning condition and a "Bird Cage" no less!

I also will be searching for a copy of this mag.

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
Those planes were based at Brunswick NAS which had its last P-3 Orions depart this week. The base will be fully closed in 2011, the last active duty military installation in New England and except for a brief period after WW2 in use for over 60 years.

I talked to someone once who claimed to have dived the site back in the 1970s. As I recall one aircraft is intact and the other pretty well broken up.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:29 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
Sweet Jeezus... :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

I remember Col. Rohr talking about these a few years back, and I sort of expected the same sort of barnacle-encrusted, vaguely Corsair-shaped remains we often see in these underwater discoveries... then I saw the attached pic in that thread.

I've seen currently airworthy aircraft which don't look that good. :shock:

That's almost- no, it definitely IS beyond belief. And the pilots remain in those aircraft, apparently... who's twisting what screws to keep those poor souls unrecovered and keep these incredibly rare aircraft entombed?

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 12:42 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
ditto on finding an issue of the mag!!! question....... what mag?? big big big question...... where does the canadian government fit into the recovery effort as representatives of it's war dead. then throw in the u.s. navy's red tape squadron via pensacola because of lend lease. this will be 1 big cluster f**k for sure. i also feel the colonel has been some what vindicated with the concrete back up of his opinion.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 800
Location: Vancouver BC
Tom

per post #40 on the linked Key Pub. forum thread (by Andy Saunders), it is the December 2009 Issue 32 of "Britain At War"; I checked the excellent magazine store that I'm lucky enough to have close by, and they still have the October issue on the stands, so might be a while before I see this issue. Here's a link to the mag in question with another pic showing the birdcage:

http://www.britain-at-war-magazine.com/

greg v.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:23 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
Thank goodness they're British! We actually have a chance at seeing them fly again!

BTW, whats the situation with the Australian Corsairs that were dumped off the coast at wars end? Besides being in a shark-infested, salt-water environment is there any large pile of these birds sitting on the ocean floor? Could they be salvaged or are they just a pile of parts now?

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:45 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
I think the British Government treats any wreckage known to contain remains as war graves. I believe since the aircraft, even though lend lease, contain remains of British servicemen then that government retains control. I have no idea whether the British Gov. would be amenable to recovering the aircraft or if they were would they then revert to USN control. The British government has not always been reluctant to salvage war grave wrecks as some years ago they allowed salvage of some Battle of Jutland wrecks but I think it did cause a stink when it was discovered.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:50 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Those aircraft will never be raised, if the British government has anything to say about it. They ARE treated as war graves and as such, will not be disturbed.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:05 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5210
Location: Stratford, CT.
I thought they would be interested in recovering there servicemen?

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:07 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Warbird Kid wrote:
I thought they would be interested in recovering there servicemen?


Nope, definitely not the case. Since the aircraft are considered "war graves", they would rather leave them in situ.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:30 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
warbird1 wrote:
Warbird Kid wrote:
I thought they would be interested in recovering there servicemen?


Nope, definitely not the case. Since the aircraft are considered "war graves", they would rather leave them in situ.


That is classicly the official response in the past...."war graves"-no touchy, but there was an element of "cost to recover" which seemed to be a factor. As mentioned on the Key forum by some members, there is talk of "shaming" the Ministry of Defense by lobbying the MOD into reversing that stand. The government could escape any costs by allowing a private firm to recover the fallen servicemen and be bequeathed the aircraft as compensation. These days hiding behind the curtain of "cost to recover" as a major factor is diminished. The technology is practicle and the rarity of the aircraft is a feasable motivation.( In this particular case., IMO)

Of course, I'm not forgeting some folks get really "wrapped round the axle" with the "war grave" issue and there is no compromise. :wink:

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Last edited by airnutz on Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:33 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Warbird Kid wrote:
Thank goodness they're British! We actually have a chance at seeing them fly again!

BTW, whats the situation with the Australian Corsairs that were dumped off the coast at wars end? Could they be salvaged or are they just a pile of parts now?

They are giant alkaseltzer tabs now Kid...pity. :?

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 6:32 am
Posts: 240
warbird1 wrote:
Those aircraft will never be raised, if the British government has anything to say about it. They ARE treated as war graves and as such, will not be disturbed.


Are you sure ? There have been hundreds of RAF wrecks digged all over Europe in the past decades, many of them "logically" fatal for the crew members(s).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 5:00 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
airmanual wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
Those aircraft will never be raised, if the British government has anything to say about it. They ARE treated as war graves and as such, will not be disturbed.


Are you sure ? There have been hundreds of RAF wrecks digged all over Europe in the past decades, many of them "logically" fatal for the crew members(s).

That is my point too, Airmanual. As well as, in one breath the proponents of sanctity of the "war grave" are basicly saying, that all military aircraft where a service member died in the aircraft never returned to service.

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: flyingsailor, Google Adsense [Bot], Scott Keller and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group