Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:35 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:52 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4321
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Looks really good but when?????

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 9:53 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1090
Location: Caribou, Maine
But why rebuild an A-36 into a P-51B (or C)? My guess is because a "P-51" is the more glamorous title for airshow work, but an A-36 is a truly rare bird -- only three extant in the world. To rebuild as a P-51 essentially destroys an A-36, in my opinion.

If anything, the A-36 type had a more extensive combat record than the early P-51 types, and the shooting up of trains and depots was quite likely more essential to the war effort than the fights air-to-air. I realize that less knowledgable people would be saying "A-36, what's that?" but that is the whole point -- A-36s were really something, and the pilots who flew these things in combat were very much in harm's way.

These pilots deserve celebration and acknowledgement and to remove an extremely rare, maybe unique flying aircraft from the scene to have, sorry but "just another" P-51 seems to me a terrible mistake. You might as well have put it on a popsicle stick, because the originalness of the A-36 has to at least some degree been lost.

Shame!

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:01 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9716
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I have to go with old iron. I mean don't get me wrong it is a beautiful looking restoration, but It is not a P-51. The A-36 is such a rare aircraft, it is sad to see one's history lost.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:04 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Sweet looking! A shame she wasn't kept as an A-36, Not my plane, not my call, but I guess that just confuses people....an A-30 what???? That's a Mustang! Nice paint scheme.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 1:43 pm
Posts: 528
Location: Fort Walton Beach FL
This aircraft is NOT A-36A, 42-83878. Basically a new built airplane. He had A-36A but sold to Collins Foundation (under restoration in FL) and built the P-51C from parts. Original plan was to convert the A-36A to a P-51B or C. Some threads, including WIX and Mustangs/Mustangs will still state this, and yes it was the plan. However, not true facts.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:15 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4613
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
So where does the 43-25057 serial come in? Dataplate from a postwar wreck?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 10:42 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1090
Location: Caribou, Maine
And why does the Warbird Registry list it as an A-36? Was RMAllnutt mistaken in saying that the P-51 featured on this thread (42-83738)?

Also, what happened to the other privately owned -36 (42-83731) on the Registry (the third A-36 is at the NMUSAF). -83731 is listed on the Registry as going to the UK for a show in 2002, but no information after that.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:04 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
A shame she wasn't kept as an A-36,

I've been correcting this falsehood for a long time but no one's listening.
A-36 s/n 42-83738 is a different a/c and will fly again soon but not in Idaho.
Time to fix the registry. The one the Mustangs site also.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
Jack - what a beautiful resoration - thanks for posting it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Cheshire, CT
Great choice on the paint scheme!
I've always wanted to see Howard's "Ding Hao" but this'll do!
Thanks for posting Jack!
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ???
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:33 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9716
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
Jack Cook wrote:
Quote:
A shame she wasn't kept as an A-36,

I've been correcting this falsehood for a long time but no one's listening.
A-36 s/n 42-83738 is a different a/c and will fly again soon but not in Idaho.
Time to fix the registry. The one the Mustangs site also.


Well if that is case, then it is a beautiful example of what a restoration should be. Jack quick question. Which do you like better, this one or HJGB

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:36 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4663
Location: Cheshire, CT
I am also wondering if they will have to add the fillet to the vertical like "Old Crow"?
I think it spoils the look.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
-----------------------

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 2:09 pm
Posts: 290
Location: Boise, ID
It is pretty funny to witness the deafness of some people on this board. I'm not sure what it takes to get it through people's heads that this is not the A-36 we used to have. The Registry has always been wrong about this. I have no idea why it has never been corrected.

For the last time, we sold the A-36 to Bob Collings many years ago..Gary Norville is working on it's restoration, go check it out. It's Gorgeous......Our P-51C was purchased by my Dad in the 70's from Jack Hardwick and had never been on the civil register until we had reason to register it, which was a few months ago. N4651C.

The rumors of the A-36 being chopped up are false and continue to be perpetuated for some reason by people that are totally clueless.

JC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
The reason for the field mod Fillet on the B/C was the perception that that it would improve yaw stability at high speeds and it was added in along with reverse rudder boost starting in August 1944.

The first D to receive it was 44-13902 as a production change and all P-51D-5s in the field were retro fitted with the fillet and metal elevators

These two changes did improve both stability in sideslips, strength for slow rolls and the reverse rudder boost made it more difficult to overstress the tail in those manuevers.

Bud Anderson's Old Crow P-51B never received this mod while it was assigned to him as he got his first P-51D-5 (with no strake/fillet) in July 1944.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sun Jun 28, 2009 11:54 am 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
The rumors of the A-36 being chopped up are false and continue to be perpetuated for some reason by people that are totally clueless.

What he said :idea: :!:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Paul Stroud and 143 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group