Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue Apr 23, 2024 8:44 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:14 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3260
Location: Phoenix, Az
richkolasa wrote:
m charters wrote:
I can even understand how someone might view the gentle smoothness of a T-28's 1820 as something other than a symphony. :)
Rich


Rich,
you need to stay away from the adult koolaid before a airshow. a T-28 sounds like a runaway john deer with no muffler, and missing half the cylinders

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:19 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1524
Location: Williamsburg, VA
This is just wonderful news, congratulations to ALL the staff of the CWH, particularly those who've worked so hard to get her back in the air! I had the opportunity to see the aircraft up close back in April 2005 (God, has it been that long?) and it looked like it was just about ready to fly then. The CWH doesn't do anything halfway, and it's a real pleasure to see such a magnificent and rare aircraft treated with the care it deserves by such a great organization.

Cheers, eh! :D

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 657
Location: Berkshire, UK
richkolasa wrote:
What displacement is the engine in the Lysander


Just under 25 litres IIRC :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:05 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Firebird wrote:
richkolasa wrote:
What displacement is the engine in the Lysander


Just under 25 litres IIRC :?

The Lysander I and III have Bristol Mercury engines, the Mk.II had the Bristol Perseus, a sleeve valve. There are no Bristol Perseus engines active anywhere, the Mercury, although one of the most common British engines of W.W.II is pretty rare these days. Currently there are two Gladiators and two Lysanders active with them, plus more Lysanders and a Blenheim to come in the near future.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Mercury

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_Perseus

Mk.II Lysanders can be spotted by the lack of 'teardrops' on the cowling, which is smaller diameter as well.

Spares are, compared to P&W and Wrights rare, but they aren't 'ultra-rare'. The issue has more been proper maintenance and operation of the engines; the first Blenheim being lost due to pilot error opening the throttles too quickly inducing a rich cut. (Established by the accident investigation and a court case.) Others have failed unexpectedly because of improper maintenance and use.

The sound has a lot to do with the exhaust system, which is interesting. I'll try and find a diagram.

HTH.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:21 am
Posts: 911
Location: NJ
Firebird wrote:
richkolasa wrote:
What displacement is the engine in the Lysander


Just under 25 litres IIRC :?


Oh, geeze...I thought 25 litres was 80 feet!

:)

Rich

_________________
Rich Kolasa
www.crystalgraphix.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:21 am
Posts: 911
Location: NJ
Matt Gunsch wrote:
richkolasa wrote:
m charters wrote:
I can even understand how someone might view the gentle smoothness of a T-28's 1820 as something other than a symphony. :)
Rich


Rich,
you need to stay away from the adult koolaid before a airshow. a T-28 sounds like a runaway john deer with no muffler, and missing half the cylinders


Yeah, like I said...A SYMPHONY.

Rich

_________________
Rich Kolasa
www.crystalgraphix.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:38 pm
Posts: 165
Location: Mount Hope, Ontario, Canada
Thanks for all the great comments. Here are a few shots from today's flying.

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Canadian Warplane Heritage Museum
http://www.warplane.com
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:35 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
One of the pilot's comments I recall was "it's wise to ensure your side windows are properly latched before takeoff - otherwise they can drop into the fuselage-side with a bang that makes you think a wing's fallen off..." :D

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:36 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
How many people can you put in the rear there, behind the pilot?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
warbird1 wrote:
How many people can you put in the rear there, behind the pilot?

It was designed to take one observer, using the gun and camera etc, (there's a ventral and oblique port for cameras). You could get a couple in if you wanted.

The Special Duties conversion put in a bench and removed the gun mounting and so forth so more people could be flown in or brought out of occupied countries. IIRC, the max lifted was five passengers. Sometimes more when one or two were children.

The TT Lysanders had a winch in between the cockpits above the fuselage tank and a winch operator in the back.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Niagara, Ontaio
Can't wait to see it at Flyfest, its awesome to see another great warbird with such an important history in Canada back in the air.

Great work!

_________________
Remembering those that served in Bomber Command!

www.bombercrew.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:54 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
I really like Lysanders and knew a guy here in Salem who flew them and built many of the Hawk kits has a kid.
Don Brook's Lysander is my favorite.
The workmanship is very impressive and a thumbs up to everyone.
But, that target tug scheme is down right ugly :!:
The only thing missing is a great big decal :shock:
Flame suit on :crispy: :crispy: :crispy:

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ????
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:03 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Jack Cook wrote:
I really like Lysanders and knew a guy here in Salem who flew them and built many of the Hawk kits has a kid.
Don Brook's Lysander is my favorite.

Is he still around, Jack?

Agreed Don's is a nice example, and his guys - 'Fish' Salmon in particular did a good job getting it flying.
Quote:
But, that target tug scheme is down right ugly :!:
The only thing missing is a great big decal :shock:
Flame suit on :crispy: :crispy: :crispy:

No flame, but a couple of thoughts from a different view: It don't need a decal as it's an authentic scheme - both for that aircraft and the majority of Canadian Lysanders. It's a lot more appropriate than the trainers in mock fighter schemes we see.

Secondly it's a real smack in the eye. That means that people will want to know 'why' it's painted like that, and that'll cause learning about the bigger picture of W.W.II to happen, including the challenges of aerial gunnery - a-good-thing.

Thirdly opinions about (accurate) schemes are entirely subjective - what works for one doesn't work for someone else; I can see where you're coming from, but I think it's neat, and not just because of the story behind it. Doesn't mean either of us is 'wrong' of course!

regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: ????
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:18 pm
Posts: 129
Location: Niagara, Ontaio
Jack Cook wrote:
I really like Lysanders and knew a guy here in Salem who flew them and built many of the Hawk kits has a kid.
Don Brook's Lysander is my favorite.
The workmanship is very impressive and a thumbs up to everyone.
But, that target tug scheme is down right ugly :!:
The only thing missing is a great big decal :shock:
Flame suit on :crispy: :crispy: :crispy:


I agree, but its authentic to what the Bombing and Gunnery schools used up here.

Try to look past the surface to see the inner beauty Jack. :D

_________________
Remembering those that served in Bomber Command!

www.bombercrew.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ????
PostPosted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:52 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11468
Location: Salem, Oregon
I do see that it's a beautiful aircraft. The first a/c I saw in that scheme
were Wes Agnew's on his farm during a trip to Canada a very long time ago.
I though it was sorta ugly then too. but, Mr Agnew was a nice fellow and had some cool stuff!
Dwight (not Don) Brooks died of cancer quite a few years ago.
The fellow here in Salem was Ron Haviland (sp). He flew Battles in France in 1940 and escapes to Ebgalnd after his squadron was decimated.
He died quite a few years ago.
Also the the former leader of the local St Andrews Society here flew Lancs in 617 Squadron 44-45.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Rod Schneider and 138 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group