Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Apr 19, 2024 9:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 9:53 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
There's something special about all of these. Anyone?

Engine 1. Deutches Museum, Munich. von Ohan.

Image

Image

Engine 2. Science Museum London.

Image

Clue:

Image

Engine 3. IWM Duxford (visiting) Flying Legends.

Image

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:35 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2531
They were all under powered. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:37 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
mike furline wrote:
They were all under powered. :D

:D Very good. Well, the alternative was no power, so, in another sense, no. ;)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:38 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11280
All early centrifugal flow compressor turbojets with reverse flow combustion chambers- and a plane one of them powered.

Do the ponies Downunder look the same as the ones in the US, or are the legs on the top?

P.S. The General Electric I-16 engines in the Planes of Fame P-59 (which should be flying this year) were copies of the Whittle W.1 engine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 2:31 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:54 pm
Posts: 2593
Location: VT
Dam Whittle, if it was not for him, we would still be traveling by 3350's!!!

_________________
Long Live the N3N-3 "The Last US Military Bi-Plane" 1940-1959
Badmouthing Stearmans on WIX since 2005
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 3:52 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1168
Location: Marietta, GA
N3Njeff wrote:
Dam Whittle, if it was not for him, we would still be traveling by 3350's!!!


I disagree. I think we'd probably have the 4360 sorted out by now...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 4:43 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2531
Kyleb wrote:
N3Njeff wrote:
Dam Whittle, if it was not for him, we would still be traveling by 3350's!!!


I disagree. I think we'd probably have the 4360 sorted out by now...


With any luck maybe a fuel efficient XR-7755.

http://www.pilotfriend.com/aero_engines/aero_xr7755.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 07, 2008 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 358
Location: UK
If it wasn't for the last one, (and I know what it is 'cos I was there so I'll keep quiet) I would have guessed they were the first engines to actually aviate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 7:18 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
dhfan wrote:
If it wasn't for the last one, (and I know what it is 'cos I was there so I'll keep quiet) I would have guessed they were the first engines to actually aviate.

Yup. I believe the Ohan engine was actually used in the He 178, while the Whittle type there is from the Gloster E28/39. Very historic.

Image

Quote:
With any luck maybe a fuel efficient XR-7755.


Jokes aside, had Whittle not pioneered [edit] the jet someone else would've - in fact they did - von Ohan in Germany. It's often overlooked that Heinkel flew the first ever successful [edit] jet aircraft in 1939. Thankfully the RLM had the attitude of some WIXers here, too, and didn't want it, otherwise all that Luft 46 stuff could have been Luft 42...

And there were others in even Spain (generally forgotten) the Italian dead-end and more. It was going to happen. Give it long enough, even the Yanks would've got it! :D

The last photo is in the same group because it's the oldest jet engine in the world capable of running. When Planes of Fame get the P-59 running, it'll be the oldest airworthy Jet type, and presumably airworthy jet engines too?

Honourable mention to Mr bdk, for technical excellence. Have a pony with no legs, silly boy. ;)

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Last edited by JDK on Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:41 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 10:45 am
Posts: 442
All those stinking jets belong in museums. Bring back the recips now. Much better fuel economy, and just plain sound better. And since we all know that with proper design a piston plane can pretty much cruise with a jet, look at the P51, and thats old school.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 6:21 pm
Posts: 117
Location: Cockatoo Australia
James,

You know I'm a big fan of your work, but I have to question the statement that Whittle invented the jet engine. That's a bit like saying that James Cook discovered Australia. Each claimed credit, but both were just adding to the knowledge discovered by others.

To my mind, the inventor of the jet engine was Romanian Henri Coanda, who exhibited his jet-powered aeroplane at the Paris Exposition in 1910. Yes, that's right, only seven years after the Wright Brothers, and a long time before Whittle. His "air-reactive" engine powered an unmanned aircraft on one flight in October 1910.

Coanda also framed one of the two main principles of flight that explain the production of lift.

Walrus

_________________
One crowded hour of glorious life
Is worth an age without a name


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:34 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
engguy wrote:
All those stinking jets belong in museums. Bring back the recips now. Much better fuel economy, and just plain sound better. And since we all know that with proper design a piston plane can pretty much cruise with a jet, look at the P51, and thats old school.

It was so much easier when the world was flat, and there were just believers and heritics, wasn't it? :D
Walrus 7 wrote:
You know I'm a big fan of your work, but I have to question the statement that Whittle invented the jet engine. That's a bit like saying that James Cook discovered Australia. Each claimed credit, but both were just adding to the knowledge discovered by others.

To my mind, the inventor of the jet engine was Romanian Henri Coanda, who exhibited his jet-powered aeroplane at the Paris Exposition in 1910. Yes, that's right, only seven years after the Wright Brothers, and a long time before Whittle. His "air-reactive" engine powered an unmanned aircraft on one flight in October 1910.

Coanda also framed one of the two main principles of flight that explain the production of lift.

Hi Walrus,
Thanks for the polite correction. I absolutely agree that it was most slack of me to say that Whittle 'invented' the jet. He was indeed developing ideas in part based on other work as he would have said; but the critical point was that he (and von Ohan) developed the idea and prototypes to successful working engines. Coandă deserves much credit (and the Deutsches Museum has a model of his aircraft) but Coandă's aircraft did not result in any further work - one may as well credit Hero.

Coandă also developed a piston engine powered reaction motor not a 'pure' jet engine of any type, but a hybrid - regarded today generally as a dead end concept; only used in prototype form, by him, and Caproni, primarily.

Whittle deserves his fame not just because of his work, but the fact that he persisted in the face of enormous discouragement and multiple obstacles. As far as Whittle knew, if he gave up, we'd still have been messing about with the piston engines discussed above! We now know about the German work, so we also know that the jet was an inevitable invention where the time had come, but it was not Greece, Rumania, Spain or Italy (all with 'jet reaction pioneers') where the first successful jet aircraft were developed to mass use - but Germany and Britain.

As to Cook, he mapped a previously disputed continent - good enough for me, couple with him being called 'James' too. ;) (He's generally regarded as one of the greatest cartographers and map makers in history. It was RAAF Seagulls which 'added to' Cooks' maps and work exploring the previously uncharted coast of Australia in the 1920s and 30s.)

It's important to recognise pioneers - but what matters is who converts that pioneering into success.

Just my view!

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 7:57 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
PS; Walrus I've been looking and all the references I have say that Coandă's piston-driven jet aircraft had him aboard, it caught fire and crashed, and was abandoned as a project. I've an open mind, but that's a long way from successful and a lot closer to a firework, IMHO! Can you clarify?

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 358
Location: UK
James could possibly be guilty of over-simplification, but it's fair to say Whittle did invent the turbojet engine.

Von Ohain independently came up with the same idea up to 5 years later depending on where you read about it.

I'd always confidently thought Whittle was the first to run a turbojet but Wiki says von Ohain beat him by a month, although running on hydrogen and basically wrecking it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 1:13 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11280
This history stuff is mighty interesting fellas, but my pony still doesn't have any legs. Does that make him a taildragger?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], phil65 and 244 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group