Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:57 am
Sun Apr 06, 2008 2:40 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:06 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 6:11 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:04 pm
Sun Apr 06, 2008 9:18 pm
Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:17 am
Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:40 am
k5083 wrote:I can only assume that the P-40N is the one still with POF
Mon Apr 07, 2008 8:58 am
Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:13 pm
Steve Nelson wrote:These "back in the day" pics are great!
What became of the Zero standing on its nose? I assume the one behind it is the currently flying example.
The 262 is with Paul Allen, yes? Are they going to re-engine it a la the Stormbird reproductions?
SN
Mon Apr 07, 2008 9:30 pm
k5083 wrote:
I never saw the nonflying Zero displayed again at Chino after 1988, and don't know where it went.
Tue Apr 08, 2008 12:32 pm
Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:26 pm
I don't think so. Since that is the only one of those engines in existence that I am aware of, you'd want to be mighty careful with it. As it is a static display, it sounds like a lot of work for little return on your investment. The money might be better spent doing a more thorough static restoration, replacing the corroded wing spars, finding better replacement tires, etc.airnutz wrote:Regardingthe J2M..I wonder if POF has ever fired her up, if not, I wish they'd invest the time to do so? I wonder what one of them sounds like???
Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:36 pm
bdk wrote:I don't think so. Since that is the only one of those engines in existence that I am aware of, you'd want to be mighty careful with it. As it is a static display, it sounds like a lot of work for little return on your investment. The money might be better spent doing a more thorough static restoration, replacing the corroded wing spars, finding better replacement tires, etc.airnutz wrote:Regardingthe J2M..I wonder if POF has ever fired her up, if not, I wish they'd invest the time to do so? I wonder what one of them sounds like???
Tue Apr 08, 2008 7:58 pm
bdk
PostPosted: Mon Apr 07, 2008 4:04 am Post subject:
That "Twin Beech" is very well modified I'd say! Laughing