Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 25, 2024 10:20 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 9:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 833
Tom, Photograph number 2 is Gondola that was lowered though the clouds from a Zeppelin so that they could see what was going on below. Anyone know if that is the correct term? Gondolier?


Last edited by armyjunk2 on Wed Oct 31, 2007 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 962
Location: my home planet is EARTH!
RMAllnutt wrote:
n5151ts wrote:
it doesnt change much and I can't help but feel that is criminal to hang those machines in the air and not allow them to fly....


Criminal!!! You must be joking. These aircraft are incredibly original airframes. You need to have some of them preserved like that. Not everything should be made to fly again. Don't get me wrong, I love flyers, but you would have to replace so much on these birds to get them flying again. I'd much rather have a mostly non-original flyer come from a bad wreck, than one of these aircraft.

The spitfire even has its original WWII paint on it. It's a Battle of Britain survivor too. Why would you want to get rid of all that history just so that it flies again? The zero has it original markings as well.

As far as not changing much, that's a load of rubbish too. True, the museum doesn't move its big exhibits that often, but the rest of the museum is constantly changing with different, highly detailed and interesting displays and themes. There's a great one in there at them moment on the Blitz. Honestly, there really is no pleasing some people.

Richard


load of rubbish ! LOL!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Oct 29, 2007 11:18 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
armyjunk2 wrote:
Tom, Photograph number 2 is gondolier that was lowered though the clouds from a Zeppelin so that they could see what was going on below. Anyone know if that is the correct term? Gondolier?

Gondola is the craft, a Goldolier is the person who makes the boat version go.

Going by the size of the holes, that's a gondol..

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 657
Location: Berkshire, UK
JDK wrote:
Spitfire Mk.I. One of the most historic and original Spitfires left, including its 1944 paint, and with combat history from the Battle of Britain. A rebuild to fly would dispose of much of the original metal, most of those rivets and all of the historic paint (irreplaceable to future researchers in all cases).


Actually, I was thinking.....which in itself is pretty dangerous, but...a question for the restoration/paint guru's..?

That 1944 paint on the Spit........if as remarked in the recent FP article on it, the sky fuse band is it's original one, then the green/grey MU applied paint is a blow over job. So, could after all these years, that be carefully removed to reveal it's original 1940 green/earth Battle of Britain paint beneath......?

Now that would truely special.......


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:52 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Firebird wrote:
Now that would truely special.......

It would, but the smart money's against it.

As I said on the Flypast thread:

JDK wrote:
SADSACK wrote:
I doubt they would have had the time to strip the green/brown paint off, surely the later scheme would have been done later "in the field"

There's two assumptions there, both of which may be correct, or not. My guess is that whether the original scheme was stripped or not, the latter scheme was applied properly; either keying the old scheme (which damages the paint significantly) or applying a primer and key over it, or quite possibly stripping it back. My other guess is that whatever is under the current scheme would be hard to get to, and won't look very nice, certainly not a full 1940 green and brown coat.

Destroying a 1944 scheme to get to a 1940 scheme on such a historic artefact is something the IWM may not feel mandated to do. It's a very different scenario from removing a inaccurate 1960s or 70s museum bodge paint.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:52 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4311
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I wonder if the IWM could do the same with the Spit that the FAA Museum did with their "time capsule" corsair. That would be awsome!

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 5:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Steve Nelson wrote:
I wonder if the IWM could do the same with the Spit that the FAA Museum did with their "time capsule" corsair. That would be awsome!

It would, but it won't. See above, and bear in mind the FAAM removed a post-war museum applied static over-paint, not a wartime properly applied airworthy paint scheme.

Would be interesting though.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:04 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4311
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I see...thanks for the clarification.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 6:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 16, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 833
JDK, Thank you


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 7:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 560
Location: Croydonia
James, the original crumpled rear fuselage section of Black 6 is up on the wall at Shoreham Museum (Kent).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2007 8:21 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Thanks, Dave & Robbo.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 31, 2007 12:11 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4614
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
James:

Quote:
V-1 & V-2. Gee. What are we waiting for? Should be a blast at shows.


Me, on the CF-TCY thread:

Quote:
I've always hoped I'd live to see one of Earl Reinert's aircraft flying again.

Well, maybe not the Ohka :shock:


Great minds think alike :?

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 285 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group