Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: AMARC Pic's
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 4:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2939
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
Found on the Web...

http://digilander.libero.it/atsg2003/AMARC2004.htm

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:07 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
all the birds their saw operational service over the years except 2, the yc 14 & yc 15, weren't they experimental prototypes to the current c-17?? the entire premise of moth balling planes is for spare parts, or re-activation in case the sh*t really hits the fan in a national emergency / conflict. i trust those 2 yc's would be parted out to keep the current c-17's flying, as i would think uncle sam down the road wouldn't re-activate two 1 of a kind prototypes, as it's just not practical.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 5:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 24, 2006 2:50 pm
Posts: 103
Location: Stalybridge, Manchester, UK
tom d. friedman wrote:
i trust those 2 yc's would be parted out to keep the current c-17's flying,


The YC-'s are nothing like the C-17's in terms of parts, if i remember rightly they are quite alot smaller and the idea of parts commanality wasnt all that big at the time.

I stand to be corrected if anyone has any better information......

Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 6:54 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
if that's the case, send em to a museum for all to enjoy rather than letting them sit out in the dust.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 7:06 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
I only thought I knew most arplanes...........what the heck is a C-27, where did they serve,and when. Never saw one before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 953
Location: Republic of Maine
The YC-'s were were experimental STOL transports and the program was canceled. Some of the concepts were resurrected in the C-17. On another note, there is a photo of an Altus AFB C-141 with it's wings and tail chopped off. I remember working on her back when I was a C-141 and C-5 mechanic at Altus. Of course, back then she was all white over gray and an A-model, then a B-model, then she got the "lizzard" camo-warpaint! Image
A sad sight, indeed! :cry: :drinkers:

_________________
I never said the jokes were Good, they're just Free! You gets whatchyas pays for!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2006 2:26 am
Posts: 199
The YC 14 is at Pima. I thought the 15 was there also.

http://www.pimaair.org/Acftdatapics/Boeing%20YC-14.htm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 10:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 223
I think the YC-15 was recalled by its manufacturer for testing.

_________________
http://floridawarbirds.wordpress.com/

Updated twice a week!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:39 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Posts: 546
They took the YC-15 back from us around 1996-97 something like that. Spent a small fortune making it flyable, and took it to California. They flew it very, very briefly and then grounded it. I was told they found serious problems in the wing not long after getting out there. I've also heard there was an engine failure. Anyway McD-D decided that it was too expensive to fix and the engines were stripped off and the rest is basically abandoned somewhere at Palmdale. The second YC-15 and YC-14 are both at AMARC and have not been released to the heritage program and so can not go to a museum, not that anybody could afford to move them anyway.

James


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 12:51 am 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11280
The YC-14 & 15 are quite a bit smaller than the C-17 and were technology demonstrators. The Boeing YC-14 utilized the Coanda effect to generate additional lift by having the engines blow air over the top of the wings, while the Douglas YC-15 utilized the blown flap concept now used on the C-17. They were not intended to be production aircraft. The YC-15 has nothing in common with the C-17, in fact the wheel pods came from a C-141 I think. One of the YC-15s was refurbished for testing by McDonnell Douglas as part of research for a commercial variant, but that idea was srapped after the merger with Boeing. The YC-15 flap system is a lot more complicated than that of the C-17.

Interestingly, the Russians built a production aircraft that looked very much like the Boeing YC-14.

YC-15 in it's final commercial paint scheme:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 2:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:42 am
Posts: 350
Obergrafeter wrote:
I only thought I knew most arplanes...........what the heck is a C-27, where did they serve,and when. Never saw one before.



The C-27 Spartan was a version of the Aeritalia G.222.
Here is a link to everything you wanted to know about the type: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-27_Spartan

This is an amazingly agile aircraft especially in it's latest verion, the C-27J:
http://www.patricksaviation.com/videos/ ... hter/1003/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 9:10 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
vernicator wrote:
Obergrafeter wrote:
I only thought I knew most arplanes...........what the heck is a C-27, where did they serve,and when. Never saw one before.



The C-27 Spartan was a version of the Aeritalia G.222.
Here is a link to everything you wanted to know about the type: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C-27_Spartan

This is an amazingly agile aircraft especially in it's latest verion, the C-27J:
http://www.patricksaviation.com/videos/ ... hter/1003/


Some were based out of Howard AFB Panama. They could get in and out of very short fields so that made them ideal for some of the operations "down south". I flew with them at a tactics school at Ft Huachuca AZ and I'll agree they were verrry agile and could turn on a dime. In debriefing, it was fun watching them give the F-16 aggressor so much difficulty on the gunnery film--slow speed, and tight turn radius down rrreal low in the weeds presented a challenge to the speedy fighter.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jan 20, 2007 11:57 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 12, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 3282
Location: Nelson City, Texas
The C-27 looks like it would make one heck of a firefighter. Did any of them ever get tried out in this application?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 21, 2007 9:57 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
It's kinda sad to see the Wright-Patt Starlifters in the Bone yard. I grew up with these aircraft flying over my house on a daily basis.

Image

This was taken a month before their retirement in April of '06

Image

and of course "The Last Flight" of the C-141 by 0177 "Hanoi Taxi" this past May

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

......and then the band and crowds slowly faded away living just another museum relic (sigh :( )

Image

Image

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 24, 2007 9:31 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
There is one Spartan in sad shape at Western Intls. yard. The rest were taken over by the State Dept. contingent down at Patrick AFB, Florida. I guess they are using them in conjunction with their OV-10D spray ops down south.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], kalamazookid and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group