Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 30, 2025 5:09 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 1:22 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1470
Mark Allen M wrote:
menards wrote:
The stars-and-bars are probably the easiest of markings to replicate correctly. No stencils or complex knowledge of geometry required. Since it is such a simple task....messing it up is the equivalent of one misspelling their own name....

Agreed.


Honest question here, no offense intended. Have either of you ever painted the US national insignia? Due to the manner in which it evolved there are some rather non-intuitive characteristics which are very easy to get wrong unless you have some knowledge of the process. If anyone is interested in just how easy it is to get it wrong, and also how to do it right, then I would recommend the article at the link below. Cheers!

https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-war ... ignia.html


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 2:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:46 pm
Posts: 540
C VEICH wrote:
Mark Allen M wrote:
menards wrote:
The stars-and-bars are probably the easiest of markings to replicate correctly. No stencils or complex knowledge of geometry required. Since it is such a simple task....messing it up is the equivalent of one misspelling their own name....

Agreed.


Honest question here, no offense intended. Have either of you ever painted the US national insignia? Due to the manner in which it evolved there are some rather non-intuitive characteristics which are very easy to get wrong unless you have some knowledge of the process. If anyone is interested in just how easy it is to get it wrong, and also how to do it right, then I would recommend the article at the link below. Cheers!

https://www.rcuniverse.com/forum/rc-war ... ignia.html


Yes, I have. Many times. The link you provided is a good resource that provides the proper dimensions as well as the evolution of the marking.

Also, whenever trying something for the first time, especially painting a marking, I was always told to make a practice run or two on something other than the final product before you attempt the final product.

That said, I stand my my statement. It's pretty easy to replicate. You even provided the step by step instructions!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2020 4:51 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7796
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eHCTaUFXpP8

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 6:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 143
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Maybe the urgency of the moment was the reason this one was left unfinished.
Attachment:
no white star.jpg
no white star.jpg [ 130.08 KiB | Viewed 1929 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 3:31 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
It's not quite the same as national insignia, but I found it curious that someone applied the registration to this Boeing 707 with a dash in it. It might be explained by the fact that it later went to Australia, who use the dash in their registrations:
Image
(Source: Aussie Airliners)

It's actually interesting when you realize that more countries in the world use letters instead of numbers in aircraft registrations and the United States is kind of the odd one out. I think a dash makes more sense when there's only letters.

Also, I recently came across this apparent mistake in designation on a C-46R, or should I say "C46-R":
Image
(Source: Airliners.net)

Although, I guess since it is technically a new variant built by Riddle, they could call it whatever they want.

EDIT: Also, for some reason it was a common thing to try to squeeze the entire serial number on the vertical stabilizer of the BT-13 and not let it run over onto the rudder. I'm not sure why this was a thing, but if I had to guess it was some combination of the fact that swapping out a damaged rudder would have caused confusion by losing the last few digits or a leftover of the early paint scheme that had the red, while and blue rudders that would have made a number hard to read:
Image
(Source: Wikimedia Commons)

You even get these weird diagonal serial numbers where they try to force them to fit:
Image
(Source: Aircraft Wrecks in Arizona and the Southwest)

Here's one where you can still see the ghosting of the number on the rudder:
Image
(Source: Age Photostock)

What makes it so strange to me is that no one else seemed to ever have those concerns. I mean just about every other American warplane was fine with dividing the serial number between the stab and rudder.

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 6:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 10:22 am
Posts: 637
Location: VA, USA
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 23, 2020 8:26 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4694
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Saw the movie From HeImage It Came a few days ago and had to grab a still shot:
Attachment:
IMG_0176.JPG
IMG_0176.JPG [ 411.29 KiB | Viewed 1810 times ]

:lol: :lol: :lol:
(BTW, can someone ID that helo?)

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:49 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Chris Brame wrote:
(BTW, can someone ID that helo?)

It's a Bell 47H. Apparently, it was written of in a crash in 1985.

By the way, if anyone isn't aware of the Internet Movie Plane Database, it can be helpful in situations like these.

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Chris that's a Bell 47H-1 Bellairus c/n 1371, the upgraded version of the bubble canopied Bell 47G. Soundproof cabin, 3 full-size leather covered seats, of 33 built. It was written off in Vermont April 28, 1985. It may have been rebuilt and survives in Canada as CF-TOI.
Being that they were built with a metal tail boom, it looks like the culprit for the upside down insignia is a prop guys mistaken application of contact plastic sheet. Surprising a "big budget blockbuster" would let that slide??? :shock:

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 25, 2020 12:55 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 9:33 pm
Posts: 4707
Location: refugee in Pasa-GD-dena, Texas
Apparently, I type a bit slower than you Noha!

_________________
He bowls overhand...He is the most interesting man in the world.
"In Peace Japan Breeds War", Eckstein, Harper and Bros., 3rd ed. 1943(1927, 1928,1942)
"Leave it to ol' Slim. I got ideas...and they're all vile, baby." South Dakota Slim
"Ahh..."The Deuce", 28,000 pounds of motherly love." quote from some Mojave Grunt
DBF


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2020 7:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:48 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Here's a really bad one. There's all sorts of things wrong with the designation format:
Image

Magnified:
Image
(Source: Blogspot)

EDIT: Although, thinking about it further, there is technically less wrong with this designation then appears at first glance. "F84-CKX" would be close to an (admittedly awkward) conversion of a USAF designation to USN format. Plus, it occurs to me that since Republic never built any aircraft for the Navy, a manufacturer letter was never assigned. This means that there would have been nothing for whomever was in charge of designations to build upon. Assuming that "C" represents Republic (using "R" would result in the designation with "XFR-1K" which was already taken by the Ryan FR Fireball) it should be written "XFC-1K".

_________________
Tri-State Warbird Museum Collections Manager & Museum Attendant

Warbird Philosophy Webmaster


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:49 pm
Posts: 864
Richard W. wrote:
Image

Posed/Fake! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2020 8:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2020 2:18 pm
Posts: 154
and then there is the PW-1W designation which is wrong on so many levels.

Attachment:
PB-1W.JPG
PB-1W.JPG [ 327.53 KiB | Viewed 1562 times ]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2020 6:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2019 8:50 am
Posts: 31
I was flabbergasted to see the NASM's long-lived goof on the X-1. It has since been corrected:
ImageGrounded Record Breakers https://www.flickr.com/photos/vzlet/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2020 7:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 11, 2014 9:09 pm
Posts: 116
Noha307 wrote:
Here's a really bad one. There's all sorts of things wrong with the designation format:
Image

Magnified:
Image
(Source: Blogspot)

EDIT: Although, thinking about it further, there is technically less wrong with this designation then appears at first glance. "F84-CKX" would be close to an (admittedly awkward) conversion of a USAF designation to USN format. Plus, it occurs to me that since Republic never built any aircraft for the Navy, a manufacturer letter was never assigned. This means that there would have been nothing for whomever was in charge of designations to build upon. Assuming that "C" represents Republic (using "R" would result in the designation with "XFR-1K" which was already taken by the Ryan FR Fireball) it should be written "XFC-1K".


FYI.....
http://thanlont.blogspot.com/2019/08/us ... erjet.html

_________________
There are some that think old airplanes fly on fairy dust and unicorn farts.

USN Ret
Recip FE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 84 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 314 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group