Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Nov 29, 2025 9:57 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:57 pm
Posts: 80
Location: Mjøndalen, Norway
A Spitfire crashed today in Norway during landing, pilot was unfortnatly killed. My he rest in peace!

The Spitfire was landing at Tynset airport when it crashed, it belongs to Biltema a Swedish company. Plane is SE-BIN or SE-BIR. The plane was here for an airshow tomorrow.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:15 am
Posts: 196
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Reported to be this aircraft:

http://www.warbirdregistry.org/spitregi ... sm845.html

http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/08/21/nyhe ... /13057945/

http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/arti ... d=10044595

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/hedm ... /1.7258558

English translation with photo links:

http://go.nrk.no/go/e/article;siteId=18 ... nMFQ5TpiTw

Image

Image

Image


Last edited by davem on Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:36 pm, edited 6 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 1:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 5:57 pm
Posts: 80
Location: Mjøndalen, Norway
Here is a link to news story in Norway.

http://www.dagbladet.no/2010/08/21/nyhe ... /13057945/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:24 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:52 am
Posts: 1949
Location: Virginia, USA
How very, very sad... my thoughts are with the pilots family and friends...

Richard

_________________
Richard Mallory Allnutt - Photography - http://www.rmallnutt.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 2:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 10:10 pm
Posts: 4434
Location: Maypearl, Texas
Very sad indeed. My thoughts and prayers to the family as well...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 8:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
How terribly sad, to lose a pilot in what seems such a mundane manner... looks as though it dug in and flipped, the same sort of accident which claimed so many lives during the war, and which killed Harry Doan in his Skyraider several years back.

The plane can be fixed, but the pilot absolutely cannot be replaced. My thoughts and condolences go to his family and friends.

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:01 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Sad news.
lmritger wrote:
How terribly sad, to lose a pilot in what seems such a mundane manner... looks as though it dug in and flipped, the same sort of accident which claimed so many lives during the war, and which killed Harry Doan in his Skyraider several years back.

Indeed. And also the tragic fatal accident of Paul Morgan's Sea Fury at Sywell in 2001, which cost him his life. There was much debate about the removal of the roll over protection structure in the case of Morgan's Sea Fury for the fitment of a second (jump) seat. This is an extract from the AAIB report on that Sea Fury accident:
Quote:
It is understood that prior to its import into the UK from the USA, this aircraft had been modified to
remove protective structures installed by the manufacturer immediately behind the pilot's station,
and which historically have provided pilots with a measure of protection during turn-over type
accidents. This was apparently done in order make space available for the installation of a jump
seat behind the pilot, within the original canopy glazing, allowing a passenger to be carried. A
similarly modified aircraft suffered a fatal landing accident in similar circumstances in the United
States during 1996. However, in both accidents, the aircraft came to rest inverted on unprepared
surfaces and the effectiveness of such a protective structure in these circumstances is not proven.

http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources.cf ... 500974.pdf

Without speculating on the cause/s of this crash, in this case the low-back Spitfires do have an armour triangle behind the pilot's head, which I understand is also intended to act as a rollover protection structure; but in this case, the structure was not enough to save the pilot's life. Grass runway operations are in most ways better for aircraft of this type and era, but this is one where there's a significant risk.

Very sad for the pilot's family and numerous others.

My condolences,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 9:55 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4528
Location: Dallas, TX
Very sad to hear this. Be careful, y'all!

Ryan

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:23 am
Posts: 67
Just to be clear here, this aircraft was, structurally, entirely as Supermarine intended. There can be no suggestion that the fatality was down to any removal of structure as was the case with the Sea Fury.


Bruce


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 7:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
The Mk XVIII roll over structure does not present much surface area to distribute any load.
Basically an inverted V with an armor plate steel attached. I think it would act at like a shovel when impacted soft soil.
Wonder why he went off the runway?
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 9:42 am 
Offline
WRG Staff Photographer & WIX Brewmaster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 8:57 am
Posts: 3532
Location: Chapel Hill, TN
Prayers go out to Friends and Family. Sad news.

Tim

_________________
www.tailhookstudio.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 22, 2010 6:49 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Bruce wrote:
Just to be clear here, this aircraft was, structurally, entirely as Supermarine intended. There can be no suggestion that the fatality was down to any removal of structure as was the case with the Sea Fury.

Thanks for the clarification, Bruce.

As Rich has commented, even with it fitted it wasn't a life-saver in this case, tragically.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 5:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 1:53 am
Posts: 260
Location: NSW
Condolences to his family.

_________________
Image
http://aircrewbookreview.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Finland
The XVIII is relatively new in the BILTEMA fleet. Is it a lot more demanding to fly in a small field than a IX for instance ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 11:20 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2004 12:11 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Finland
51fixer wrote:
The Mk XVIII roll over structure does not present much surface area to distribute any load.
Basically an inverted V with an armor plate steel attached. I think it would act at like a shovel when impacted soft soil.
Wonder why he went off the runway?
Rich



As far as I know he ( Bertil ) was trying to abort the landing..and then hit the long hey and went over the nose.
Also a video exists of the mishap...not yet available for the public.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 124 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group