Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:34 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 11:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:42 am
Posts: 23
In this month's Air and Space Smithsonian magazine, Vernon Rich talks about the long, slow, trip back to the US in the team's C-7 Caribou.

https://www.airspacemag.com/airspacemag ... 180978695/

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 21, 2021 4:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
Really amazing that they made it is as close as they did with all the shortcuts and safety third attitude for much of the project. A noble effort that we all wish had succeeded, but perhaps destined to fail. Thanks for posting as I have followed this saga for decades.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 22, 2021 5:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 313
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
Yeah a lot of lessons have been learnt the hard way..

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2021 5:47 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 6:23 pm
Posts: 2939
Location: Somewhere South of New Jersey...
I heard or read that the C-7 used in the Kee Bird effort was eventually scrapped. Is that true?

_________________
"Everyone wants to live here (New Jersey), evidenced by the fact that it has the highest population per capita in the U.S..."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 24, 2021 9:41 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 5:11 pm
Posts: 1111
Location: Outer Space
APG85 wrote:
I heard or read that the C-7 used in the Kee Bird effort was eventually scrapped. Is that true?



According to this message string, yes. viewtopic.php?f=3&t=70874

It was in pretty rough shape

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 8:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 460
Location: Nevada
I do work with Vern off and on, his shop is just down the street from me, he has some very interesting stories of what never made it to film on that whole recovery attempt. He is a a nice guy and can fabricate anything.

Scott.....


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:42 am
Posts: 23
RNDMTRS4EVR wrote:
I do work with Vern off and on, his shop is just down the street from me, he has some very interesting stories of what never made it to film on that whole recovery attempt. He is a a nice guy and can fabricate anything.

Scott.....


I did a search before posting this thread, and saw there were several previous Kee Bird threads. Lots of speculation, and as can be expected, some Monday Morning Quarterback-ing. I figured I'd start a new thread instead of reigniting an old one. I also bought the "Chasing Warbirds" book, hoping it arrives any day now.

At the risk of kicking-off another round of Kee Bird criticisms, I've always been curious about how things would have unfolded had the plane not caught fire. Most importantly, how sure was the crew that the aircraft could get off the ground on their short runway? Believe they had carved a 2000-3000 foot runway out of the snow and ice, albeit still bumpy.

Had they run the numbers, and come up with some level of confidence that they'd be able to keep the aircraft pointed straight down the runway, and gain enough speed to takeoff? Or was there some level of "I hope this works" involved?

Would love it if Vern would come on this board, and do a Reddit-style Ask Me Anything (AMA). I always thought the Kee Bird recovery story was an incredible tale of adventure; like a modern Indiana Jones story.


Last edited by blue3992 on Thu Oct 28, 2021 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:50 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 1933
Location: Meriden,Ct.
So the recovery attempt took three years ?
Didn't realize it was that long, I guess the show made it seem shorter.

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 4:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 7:02 am
Posts: 313
Location: Up the Hill,Norwest from Brizzy
phil65 wrote:
So the recovery attempt took three years ?
Didn't realize it was that long, I guess the show made it seem shorter.

Phil

Weather was a big factor I think.

_________________
If the CO ask,s you to be Tail End Charlie...Just Shoot Him..A Piece of Cake


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 10:11 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1157
blue3992 wrote:
.....At the risk of kicking-off another round of Kee Bird criticisms, I've always been curious about how things would have unfolded had the plane not caught fire. Most importantly, how sure was the crew that the aircraft could get off the ground on their short runway? Believe they had carved a 2000-3000 foot runway out of the snow and ice, albeit still bumpy.

Had they run the numbers, and come up with some level of confidence that they'd be able to keep the aircraft pointed straight down the runway, and gain enough speed to takeoff? Or was there some level of "I hope this works" involved?......


Very much seems to be a "hope this works" attitude. The take off area was very rough, and take off was only one obstacle. I seem to recall some discussion of how much the USAF would have actually helped/looked the other way if they had made it to Thule AFB, I believe the intended first destination if they had made it off the lake area. I do not believe the USAF was very keen on the whole operation (with some justification and some already hurt feelings), and it seemed the effort was more inclined to ask for forgiveness rather that permission if they bounced into Thule. There were still tremendous obstacles between the lakebed and the states: significant ranges and terrain between the lake and Thule where and engine loss or other emergency could have been catastrophic, support at Thule (would the USAF allow hangar space/work?, AVGAS? the USAF "shutting them down" due to aircraft condition?), then if they got out of Thule they still had long way to go to the US via long overwater stretches and remote Canadian and US wilderness. Plenty of opportunities for something else to go wrong.

The safest method would have been diss-assembly in place, and transport for restoration or preservation, but that would have been prohibitively expensive and difficult.

I too would have loved to see them pull it off. Like Glacier Girl, she would have tremendous provenance if on display today.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dhfan, Google [Bot] and 97 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group