Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Mar 29, 2024 2:26 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 8:13 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Originally it was designed and ordered for the Dutch KNLM, and licence produced in Holland, before also entering German service. Dutch Do-24s escaped to Australia after the Japanese invasion, and were used by the RAAF until serviceability dropped. There is still a Do-24 nose as a houseboat on the Murray river, but I've yet to track it down (the Murray is Australia's largest longest river.)

This one is one of the ex-Spanish Air Force examples (both the French and Spaniards used it for post-war ASR work) before being donated to the RAF Museum. They in turn loaned it to the Dutch Military Aviation Museum who reconfigured it to an aircraft known as 'The old Soldier' with a Mickey Mouse cartoon on. It was used in the Dutch East Indies after the Japanese invasion for clandestine work.

Image

And what they looked like in Dutch service in Australia:

Image

And then in RAAF use:

Image

And finally, the sole Dornier Do-24ATT Technology demonstrator. An ex-Spanish Do-24 fitted with three turbos, retractable gear and a new Dornier wing. Now owned and flown by Iren Dornier, seen here a couple of years ago at Biggin Hill, UK.

Image

Image

Not everyone gets to stand on a Dornier and watch a Spitfire go by at Biggin Hill. Old enemies, new friends.

Image

Cheers,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:18 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/germ ... art_2.html

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 10:35 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 10:10 pm
Posts: 4173
Location: Pearland, Texas
Our TA-4 was restored/reassembled at AVCRAFT in Myrtle Beach N.C. Avcraft is the company that acquired the Dornier assets when they went bankrupt. The Myrtle Beach facility was created to do the heavy maintenance on the Dornier 328T and 328 Jet. I walked into their office one day and a very unassuming guy was sitting against the wall. He was introduced to me as Iren Dornier. He was just stopping in to say hello and was very interested in the Skyhawk. He didn't bring the Do-24ATT with him. It was in another part of the world waiting to fly its next leg of the around the world tour. He seems to be a very nice guy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 03, 2007 11:56 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
That's an excellent article Mgawa. Your photos? All very nice. I'd look ed it up before, IIRC, but thanks for the reminder.

RickH, interesting, thanks. I had some correspondence and a longish interview with Iren at Biggin, and he was charming, down to earth and very open. Putting the ATT back into airworthy condition was quite the job.

The website for the aircraft is: www.do-24.com It's rather fancy and flashy, but interesting.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:05 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3321
Interesting thread James. I'd seen the ATT in the museum at Oberschleissheim in around 1997 or 1998. Good to see it back in the air again.

http://www.do-24.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:10 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: northern ohio
it's profile is so low to the water, i'd bet the the possibility of swamping in rough water conditions was a real hazard.

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:22 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9715
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I saw it fly at Oshkosh, and it was really great to see.

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:48 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
tom d. friedman wrote:
it's profile is so low to the water, i'd bet the the possibility of swamping in rough water conditions was a real hazard.

You'd think so, but no. Until the modern hydrodynamic design of the Shin Meiwa, it was almost certainly the most seaworthy seaplane of the period (allowing for size). Handled waves and swell better than any Allied 'boat, and with sponsons rather than floats much less likely to lose a stabiliser and turn turtle, which accounted for hundreds of Allied 'boats. The Boeing 314 had sponsons (an exception in Allied and Japanese types) and was a great aircraft, but not as tough as the Dornier. Could bash through for take off and landing in sea states and in wave heights no Grumman (excellent 'boats) generally should handle (those floats again).

Keeping the hatches closed is a good idea, though. ;)

Have a look at Mgawa's link - interesting stuff.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Last edited by JDK on Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 12:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:38 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Idaho
tom d. friedman wrote:
it's profile is so low to the water, i'd bet the the possibility of swamping in rough water conditions was a real hazard.


Actually, the Dorniers were considered to be excellent flying boats in rough, open water.
The earlier Wals, Super Wals and Do 18s were all flown over open water with little fear for rough water landings.

_________________
Avoid that sinking feeling -- Check the hull plugs on your pre-flight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 9:00 pm
Posts: 92
Location: Ballarat, Victoria, Australia
G'day James,

Interesting thread about a fairly obscure type. There is indeed a Do-24 houseboat here in Australia, although it no longer serves as such, having been based on terra firma for probably at least 5 years now. It would be that sort of time frame since I managed to have a look at it. It was certainly set aside for preservation, although re-structuring of the organisation's displays leaves me wondering if they've still got it.

Hope all is well mate.

Cheers,
Matt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 3:37 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
Dear JDK- some image I also have but article and photo material is made by Nico Braas. He is now preparing article about the French flying boats. No problem if you or any else want to see larger size image.

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 4:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 2:38 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Idaho
" take off and landing in sea states and in wave heights no Grumman (excellent 'boats) generally should handle (those floats again)."

Only the Albatross and to a lesser extent, the Duck were really suited for rough, open water.
The other Grumman boats were limited to sea heights of under 3 feet max
for the Mallard and less for the Goose and Widgeon.
If I remember correctly the Widgeon was limited to waves of no more than 18 inches, then they started hitting the prop blades.
The tip floats were really no problem since the struts were fairly short and the floats were well braced.

_________________
Avoid that sinking feeling -- Check the hull plugs on your pre-flight.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 5:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
Durch crew more prefer it then Catalina.

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:03 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6880
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Thanks for the input, and answers!
Mr Widgeon wrote:
The tip floats were really no problem since the struts were fairly short and the floats were well braced.

True, but I'd think inferior in terms of safe landings and take-offs on rough water to a sponson arrangement. I'm no seaplane pilot (as well as no pilot) but the stresses, turning moments and chance of float loss are presumably much more significant than the buoyancy and 'tender' return to upright (without risk) of the sponsons, on a choppy sea with floats hitting crests or going into waves.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 6:33 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
JDK- you are from Australia, do you know anything about one hull of this airplane which is converted into the classic toursit boats and still is operated? Do you have any images? Hope I don't ask too much.

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ErrolC, The Ripper and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group